Wikipedia

[rbeer]

NodeBB isn't threaded though, is it? Did I miss that option?

[PitaJ]

@rbeer NodeBB can run in a cluster, so yes.

[julian]

Or if you're referring to threaded topics.... it can be done...

[TiaZzz]

Glad you got nodeBB included in the list - congrats!

As someone that recently went through that list in search of a modern forum, I suggest submitting either changes or additions to the rather stale list of features. APIs, messaging/chats, admin control through the browser are features I think are more important today than aforementioned calendar.

The wiki article reflects the stale nature of traditional forums. Best way to combat it (and spread the good word of nodeBB) is to propose changes to the article.

[julian]

You have to propose changes now? Back in my day, you could just make whatever changes you wanted without asking for permission, dagnabbit

[Kowlin]

@julian the Dutch wikipedia still have some pages unlocked where you can just edit whenever you want it seems. Besides that I find WikiMedia totally confusing and don't dare to touch it

[psychobunny]

Well, looks like we got deleted again: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Comparison_of_Internet_forum_software&action=history

I guess it's because NodeBB isn't forum software - it's much more awesome than that.

[julian]

Perhaps someone should direct this person here, so we can show them NodeBB

[lenovouser]

@psychobunny, yeah. Just undo his deletions all the time. It is >4 against 1 He is a phpBB fan, I looked at his contributions. I hate Wikipedia for the possibility that people can delete something just because they don't like it

[TiaZzz]

If it's fanboyism he has a strange way of doing it, given all the other forums on that page. I bet he's just ignorant.

[lenovouser]

What makes me really angry is this:

This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (June 2011)

I added citations to everything for NodeBB!

NONE of the other forum entries have this! Not one of them! -.-

He is such a di**

And he is German too -.- I hate my country. Most toxic players. Most toxic cheaters in game. Most toxic Wikipedia contributors ^^

[Kowlin]

@ApfelUser Isn't there a possibility that we can bring this to the light of a Wikipedia administrator? I'll have a look around, see how we can report him.

[TiaZzz]

Perhaps wait and see if he tries to remove it again? Right now the article is ok.

[Kowlin]

@TiaZzz The thing is. It seems like he did it before, with another open source forum called ModernBB. (Now named Luna)

Edit: right here

[julian]

Yeah I'd probably appeal to an admin. Editors on Wikipedia tend to let power get to their head

[lenovouser]

He wants the article first. So again:

Does someone still have the old copy of the wikipedia:NodeBB article? Because when you click on the link you get the message that this article has existed before and got deleted due to:

No explanation of significance (real person/animal/organization/web content/organized event)

I'd like to take a look at it, rewrite it a bit and then post it with the message that NodeBB is in the forum list now too.

[julian]

Hey, it looks like the article is back now

Seems a little unfair that it was speedy deleted, of all things... we're not exactly spammers, now are we?

[Kowlin]

This is literally becoming a contest of who can shout the loudest

[Bri]

Isn't that like most things in life?

[lenovouser]

as @julian said, the old NodeBB article up again. We would really appreciate you guys helping in expanding the article. Small contributions help too! It is so that the wikipedia editor's see that the page is active & maintained. We don't want it to be deleted right away again

wikipedia:nodeBB