Translators group

julian

@[email protected] I think AP implementors are in a unique position to be able to play the long game.

We have a stable protocol and a broad base of implementors trying many different approaches to realize that protocol. It's a more shotgun approach but one that has the potential to hit a wider audience united under a common, free protocol.

Big names like Ghost signing on are a great sign that the tools that content creators are using are providing support.

There will be a tipping/inflection point.

@[email protected]

julian

@[email protected] think of your instance as being a window from which you can view the fediverse.

I'm in my own window somewhere else. Might be the window looks different (different software), but we can still talk to each other.

I'm speaking to you from an old-fashioned forum called NodeBB.

julian

@[email protected] I think we're closer than we think.

There are a few devs working on an ActivityPub specific implementation to solve just this problem. I'll be speaking about it at FOSDEM this February at the after hours event.

It's one of the fedi "hard problems", but there's a light at the end of the tunnel.

julian

@[email protected] said in "Any claims that any talk was allowed for sponsorship reasons are false":

... A protest that doesn't disrupt proceedings? What?

A free speech zone, if you will.

<baris>

They are not generated live. If we only apply it to new slugs then you will have tons of slugs in the old format. Not sure if that will lead to other issues.

<baris>

So if it works on this forum it must be something on yours that's causing it.

<baris>

You can open an issue on our github, it is likely a breaking change because it would alter old slugs, for example if a user had a userslug of àáäâ i would become aaaaafter this change, same for categories, groups. So it isn't a simple change of just updating the slugify function.

julian

@[email protected] I'll be there! I'm presenting a talk at the after hours Social Web event at HSBXL.

DownPW

YO,

Go here :

Want to include Fancybox in NodeBB without a plugin?

That’s exactly what I wanted to do. You may have noticed that the images here are handled via Fancybox, and you can do the same with your own forum as follow...

Sudonix | A one-stop-shop for all your technology questions (sudonix.org)

@phenomlab created a topic on sudonix to do this without a plugin !!!

Many thanks to him

But it is true, that image visualization should be integrated into NodeBB directly into the core.

julian

@[email protected] nice work @[email protected] @[email protected]!

Translators

Posts

Want to include Fancybox in NodeBB without a plugin?

Member List