Guns
-
doomsider@lemmy.worldreplied to arcaneslime@lemmy.dbzer0.com last edited by
No you were claiming that you need a light on your gun so you can tell whether or not they are the person your intending to kill. I am sure they are the bad guy in your fantasy or whatever bullshit goes through you head.
Clearly there are some people who could handle firearms and use them responsibly. You are just not one of them.
-
arcaneslime@lemmy.dbzer0.comreplied to doomsider@lemmy.world last edited by
If you're questioning "burglar or wife" because "dark?" Yeah, "flashlight" solves that real fast. You don't think a flashlight will help you see whether someone is your wife or a burglar? Your wife look like a lot of burglars or something? Why are you so against gun safety lmao? It's really strange tbh.
No u lol, you're the one advocating against best safety practices for cool alpha internet points, seek help.
-
auzy@lemmy.worldreplied to doomsider@lemmy.world last edited by
I know you got downvoted, but in other countries and anywhere other than lemmy, the US and truth social, this is actually normal
It's crazy that extremist groups like the NRA have managed to brainwash so many Americans
-
auzy@lemmy.worldreplied to fades@lemmy.world last edited by
In other countries this is normal. Including here in Australia
Maybe you need to rethink some things and get some perspective from countries where we don't have regular mass shootings. Our kids don't need to do training for school shootings
-
doomsider@lemmy.worldreplied to auzy@lemmy.world last edited by
Oh I know what I was getting into by commenting on their post. I will gladly take downvotes from gun nutters.
I appreciate what you say though because in the US it seems easy to question your sanity at times.
-
doomsider@lemmy.worldreplied to arcaneslime@lemmy.dbzer0.com last edited by
'No u lol"
Okay Asinineallthetime.
-
deadworldwalking@lemmy.worldreplied to tattorack@lemmy.world last edited by
Cool, well that's definitely not an option now that we voted in a right wing fascist.
Maybe once leftists get in charge again.
-
deadworldwalking@lemmy.worldreplied to piemeplenty@lemmy.world last edited by
Cool, if the dumb as shit fascist down the street owns a gun and wants you to die for being different then you need to protect yourself.
-
blind3rdeye@lemm.eereplied to arcaneslime@lemmy.dbzer0.com last edited by
Hmm.. If you say 8% of people carry guns, then surely there's a much higher than 9% chance that someone will have a gun at the scene. So something seems a bit off there.
I'd suggest that instead of just imagining how the percentage of people carrying guns might effect these stats, it might be better to try to measure that effect by looking at similar stats for other countries where gun carrying is far less common.
-
narauko@lemmy.worldreplied to doomsider@lemmy.world last edited by
We have not only more guns in circulation than people, but a constitutional right to those guns that you would have to overcome to remove them all.
I never expected to see a "those who disagree with me are actual Nazis" in the wild, used apparently straight faced. Godwin's law kicked in very quickly.
-
narauko@lemmy.worldreplied to doomsider@lemmy.world last edited by
You must be white passing and at least middle class to trust bringing the police into any situation.
-
narauko@lemmy.worldreplied to piemeplenty@lemmy.world last edited by
And that is where the difference between privileges and rights is. Privileges exist by definition for the privileged.
-
auzy@lemmy.worldreplied to doomsider@lemmy.world last edited by
Yep.. Whats crazy, is that literally a few months ago, everyone was pointing out how weird the nutters on the right wing are. And how rediculous the gun nuts are
Now, somehow, there seems to have been some kind of concerted campaign that have made a lot of these people start to act exactly like the extreme right, where shooting seemingly anyone you don't like is apparently "ok"
-
narauko@lemmy.worldreplied to madison420@lemmy.world last edited by
It depends on the State for specific legality.
Armed or not, an actual threat or not, an intruder into an occupied home leaves benefit of the doubt at the entry point they used to get in. It might have been intended as a burglary instead of a home invasion, but the perpetrator does not get to make that distinction.
There is a tangible difference between regular property crime like shoplifting, fraud, or theft outside of a dwelling and the violation of a home. And another tangible difference if that home is occupied.
-
doomsider@lemmy.worldreplied to narauko@lemmy.world last edited by
Proud of being dumb I guess. Hur dur we got most guns than anyone and a million deaths over the last twenty years to prove it. Aww shucks.
I never expected to see so many gun apologist bootlickers. Better run cause the gun grabbers are cumin fer yah.
-
doomsider@lemmy.worldreplied to narauko@lemmy.world last edited by
Like anyone who grew up poor you know not to trust anyone including officers. I have called 911 on guys beating their girlfriends. I have had an officer pull their gun on me for no reason. I have lived in big cities, small, and rural so I know a thing or two.
-
doomsider@lemmy.worldreplied to auzy@lemmy.world last edited by
Well gun supporters have been at war with the truth for a long time. People I call gun nutters have an unhealthy obsession with guns. They keep them unsecured and loaded and like to fantasize about killing people in "self defense".
America's obsession with guns definitely cuts both ways but when you compare the left and right wing 95% of attacks come from the right. It is an unfortunate reality but the people who we can least trust are the ones who are the most for guns.
Really though this is a problem of regulation. Commercial interests have manipulated people into buying tools they don't need which are misused and cause untold suffering.
-
narauko@lemmy.worldreplied to doomsider@lemmy.world last edited by
I was more pointing out that there are legal and constitutional hurdles beyond the number of guns, the later of which you are hand waving away under a "the second best time is now" argument and ignoring the former. Especially with the current Supreme Court, we have at least 4 years before further gun control legislation attempts can be made. State and county guns bans and control laws are being struck down as unconstitutional left and right.
I am pro private gun ownership personally and believe in a legal right to self defense, but am not even talking about that. You are vigorously arguing for a pipe dream of seemingly "just make guns illegal, it will work out from there", in the current political climate, while calling people with different opinions Nazis. All those blank steps before Profit are doing some very heavy lifting.
-
madison420@lemmy.worldreplied to narauko@lemmy.world last edited by
Sure, this is adjudicated though there's absolutely zero question to it at this point.
No one said they did.
Correct, the jury instructions are public and literally all of that is in it.
I'm not even quite sure what your point is.
-
arcaneslime@lemmy.dbzer0.comreplied to doomsider@lemmy.world last edited by
Lol ad hominem, the mark of someone who "won" an argument.
Thanks for playing dingus.