Wikipedia
-
@psychobunny, yeah. Just undo his deletions all the time. It is >4 against 1
He is a phpBB fan, I looked at his contributions. I hate Wikipedia for the possibility that people can delete something just because they don't like it 
-
What makes me really angry is this:
This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (June 2011)
I added citations to everything for NodeBB!
NONE of the other forum entries have this! Not one of them! -.-
He is such a di**
And he is German too -.- I hate my country. Most toxic players. Most toxic cheaters in game. Most toxic Wikipedia contributors ^^
-
@ApfelUser Isn't there a possibility that we can bring this to the light of a Wikipedia administrator? I'll have a look around, see how we can report him.
-
He wants the article first. So again:
Does someone still have the old copy of the wikipedia:NodeBB article? Because when you click on the link you get the message that this article has existed before and got deleted due to:
No explanation of significance (real person/animal/organization/web content/organized event)
I'd like to take a look at it, rewrite it a bit and then post it with the message that NodeBB is in the forum list now too.
-
This is literally becoming a contest of who can shout the loudest
-
Isn't that like most things in life?
-
as @julian said, the old NodeBB article up again. We would really appreciate you guys helping in expanding the article. Small contributions help too! It is so that the wikipedia editor's see that the page is active & maintained. We don't want it to be deleted right away again
-
Jeez. Wiki editors are weird. You would think some information was better than no information but nooo. Got to regulate! Not to mention that the comparison article says nothing about having the main article first.
Let's hope the articles get to stay this time.
Edit: Spoke too soon: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/NodeBB
God damn it. How does one reply to this internet hotshot? I've stayed out of wiki wars for years but since this could have helped me greatly a few months ago as I went over that exact list.
-
Nominated for deletion: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/NodeBB
Please chime in and defend here!
Please refrain from ad hominem attacks against YannickFran. Cohesive, sane arguments will win this for us.
-
Just to get on a lighter topic, should we not be focusing on spreading NodeBB to other sites as well... Maby with some less insane users
-
Always up for that. After the article was initially deleted in 2013, I thought "oh well, it's just Wikipedia". Not really worth the stress of defending our notability as there are lots of sites promoting us anyhow
We're top of the list here! I like that a lot
-
Thanks guys for helping
I made some changes from the original 2013 article (which to be fair, had a whole bunch of "marketing" talk). It's now pretty neutral I would think.If it gets deleted then well I don't know anymore haha I give up and I will post a new topic 2 years from now and try again. In the meantime, feel free to use KeyboardBB or whatever else that has a calendar plugin
Also, just echoing @julianlam, please don't antagonize anybody
EDIT:
@pitaj no offense to your calendar plugin haha, it just seemed weird that it would be one of the most important criteria for forum software
-
Please add another comment to Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/NodeBB including
'''Keeping''' or '''Keep'''This is necessary according to Wikipedia:Guide_to_deletion
