SOLVED: Canonical tags hurting SEO?
-
I have another project coming up and I thought nodebb might be a good fit but this canonical thing is making me nervous. The site will 100% count on being indexed but if search engines cannot go through all of the pages, there's no point.
Can anyone at all confirm that this is not a problem for them? I mean, someone who is highly experienced with SEO and search engines, not just someone saying 'works for me' :).
-
@NodeHam works for me
-
@NodeHam these latest warnings are just that, warnings. You will absolutely not have issues with pages not being indexed.
That said, a lot of SEO depends on proprietary algorithms that we are not privy to. We can only do our best to ensure that the right tags are present, but you, the site owner, have to make sure there is good content to index!
Remember, Google, Bing, Yandex, etc. will never intentionally omit sites just because they don't have "the right tags". There are lots of sites that do absolutely no SEO at all that rank well.
-
I think this is solved and I'll explain why.
I was doing a little digging and came across this;
These are some of the older posts in the forums. Searching more, I find nothing what so ever.
I even cut/pasted some specific posts.For example;
"7m outage noted as Internal when it shoud have been Provider"
... and nothing comes up unless I enter the whole title in quotes.
I then tried some others and the same thing happened. Unless I quote them, they never show up BUT that's because of SEO but not in a bad way, in a Goolg way.
The point is, the posts WERE found on Google if I quoted part or full title which means that search engines are in fact indexing the forums.
Do I get a free biscuit or something?
-
