plugin load sequence

[frissdiegurke]

@julian said in plugin load sequence:

@yariplus said in plugin load sequence:

@pichalite That seems to me to be the case.

However, the code does not agree -- they are run in series.

They do time out for performance reasons, however. e.g. a static hook will continue with the next listener if the current one takes longer than 2 seconds.

That reference is for filter hooks, isn't it? @yariplus and @pichalite are talking about static hooks (e.g. static:app.load). For static hooks @yariplus already referenced the relevant line to prove his point.
With that in mind I don't see any obvious solution/hook for that purpose, nor any reasonable use-case.

[julian]

Aah yes... static hooks are called asynchronously for performance reasons. Thanks for pointing that out @frissdiegurke, my apologies for missing your link in the earlier post @yariplus

We could change it to eachSeries... not that big a deal, to be honest.

[yariplus]

I'm fine with it being each. But that's really a separate issue. The app.load hook is not where we should be modifying templates.