Just to mention, I think Amazon SES blocks sending on port 25 by default. They advise you to use 587 and StartTLS instead. If you have to use port 25 you are required to submit a request for them to allow it for you. I ran into that on helping a Xenforo admin that was wanting to use SES and was insistent that port 25 was what they wanted to use for some unknown reason.

ERROR in ./build/public/src/modules/topicThumbs.js 104:6-106:8 Module not found: Error: Can't resolve 'composer' in '/home/xxxxx/htdocs/xxxxx/build/public/src/modules' Activate nodebb-plugin-composer-default and then rebuild restart again.

@baris @ti-pa audio embed is cleared for latest NodeBB

Jeez I feel stupid for posting this. Of course, I forgot to rebuild that time. Thanks for your help.

@julian Yes, I still have to study this, but it really looks intentionally overcomplicated and confusing. It is now being forced by European funds, but I am extremely skeptical about this implementation. Much more friendly technologies have sunk into oblivion because they did not solve the problems of the mass audience and were not understood by them. Here, so many problems are created and it is unclear what problem is being solved at all. For example, discovery of new content or new platforms is impossible. I already need to have my own active communities or have many friendly platforms to get at least some distribution outside my forum. But if I already have friendly communities, then this technology is not so important to me because we can exchange links manually.

Yes, sending images in private message(to pixelfed) works in mastodon . Pixelfed private messages (both to and from) seem to be having some problem now(or may be intentionally disabled) otherwise I would have double-checked and confirmed whether pixelfed can receive the image, but as much as I remember from last night, the image was visible from pixelfed.

@baris said in How to give the ONLY permission to create tags to the admin?: You can use the tag whitelist feature. This limits users to only the whitelisted tags by admins thanks for your reply, I've got a solution. many thanks again.

@nhl.pl thanks for reporting, filed an issue https://github.com/NodeBB/NodeBB/issues/13067

why didn’t I think of that myself? Thank you @[email protected] and thank you for this release

@[email protected] reply from nodebb to see if there's an 'actor' in the Create activity

Thanks, i will check this.

Awesome, will have to check it out. Would the plugin work with the upcoming 4.0 version?

@eeeee [image: 1736910127891-83a537a7-3117-4b6f-a978-11d1bd1fd5ab-image.png] I need a way to view only the message of the sender

@baris Thanks a lot, this is very helpful

@baris Thanks!!

thanks you so much!

https://github.com/NodeBB/NodeBB/issues/13023

Hi @alter_kaker! You'll want to press the "Add Group" button at the bottom right of the privilege table. [image: 1738000400362-d549a9cd-ffff-4193-87e5-8dfa2decee76-image.png] Keep in mind that privileges are additive.

@Astro-What said in Discouragement and user discipline: In all that time, I've only used this function a few times. If you are talking about people with a problematic mentality who are involved in stalking, then I don't see any other ways except for legal methods of influence and permanent blocking. Shadow ban is the path to hell. Today you enabled it for a stalker, and tomorrow a user will appear who simply says inconvenient things or surpasses you or one of the moderators in a dispute and someone will use it again. I had similar cases too. Not so much to worry about. You just need to strictly follow your own rules, especially if it is clear that the user is problematic. And sometimes it even helps to unite the community, especially when everyone sees that the moderation is adequate, and the user is clearly doing something destructive. If the problematic user directly points out problems that really exist but are perhaps not visible to the admin or he does not understand it, then I will never ban even such a problematic user because he helps me find problems, even at the cost of some of my or my moderators' discontent. @julian said in Discouragement and user discipline: @Kosiak shadow bans ought to be reserved for spammers. @DownPW said in Discouragement and user discipline: You will see when spammers and trolls spammers are not trolls. A spam bot should be blocked, preferably before its post is seen by an administrator. There is no reason to shadowban a spam bot. Only algorithms for rejecting their messages and a permanent ban. Spam protection is something that should be done automatically because there is also automation on the opposite side.