We just released version 2.6.0 of the #ActivityPub plugin for #WordPress
-
We just released version 2.6.0 of the #ActivityPub plugin for #WordPress
You can now (finally) add/edit/delete the extra fields, we improved the remote-reply overlay quite a bit and made a lot of smaller tweaks and fixes.
Let us know if you have some feedback!
ActivityPub
The ActivityPub protocol is a decentralized social networking protocol based upon the ActivityStreams 2.0 data format.
WordPress.org (wordpress.org)
-
@[email protected] nice, congrats!
Who does your art assets (like the cover photo)? We'd love to work with them too.
-
Paul Chambersreplied to Matthias Pfefferle on last edited by [email protected]
Thanks for your continued work and development of this tool.
-
Adam S. Smithreplied to Matthias Pfefferle on last edited by
@pfefferle I can't find the Extra Fields section on my blogs, how do I add them?
-
Matthias Pfefferlereplied to Adam S. Smith on last edited by
@AdamStuartSmith they are only for authors for now and you can find them on the profile settings and/or as profile submenu.
-
silverpillreplied to Matthias Pfefferle on last edited by
-
@[email protected] Whoa, thanks for highlighting this line in the changelog!
I wasn't aware of fb2a until just now, and after reading it, I 100% support it. Was hesitant to follow Mastodon's lead due to the schema.org bit, but this FEP handedly sidesteps it using existing AP vocabulary. Love it. Nice work @[email protected]
-
@julian @trwnh It is also implemented in Streams. I think implementation list would be useful: https://codeberg.org/fediverse/fep/pulls/375
(my server can parse fb2a attachments, but it doesn't create them yet)
-
@julian for some reason this didn't show up in my mentions, huh.
-
@[email protected] odd... How about this one?
-
@julian same issue with this one! only shows up on your profile, not in my home feed or mentions. i’m not sure if you made a change recently or if m.s did!
-
@[email protected] backfill and sync are two components of an overall implementation of resolvable contexts. The context
iditself would be the discriminator between different contexts, but there are further discussions to be had (and agreed upon) regarding what a canonical context is, and how contexts relate to each other.e.g. a given conversation may contain objects that report several different contexts, how do we reconcile that for backfill and sync?
So these issues I'd like to discuss at next ForumWG before I start drafting a report or FEP.
-
@[email protected] knowing my luck it's something I did. If it does show up on my timeline then it means it successfully federated, but if you weren't notified then perhaps the mention was not included in the federated payload. Will have to check.
-
@julian speaking of things not federating correctly, i responded on socialhub to a post of yours and it doesn't seem to have made it across: https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/changing-the-domain-of-an-existing-instance/4373/2
-
@[email protected] thanks, manually pulled it in. @[email protected] mentioned the same, but I thought I fixed it.
Looks like I'll have to look into it again. It might be related to how Discourse currently reports the NodeBB topic as the
context(since the original thread was from NodeBB) but since it's not actually in the collection it doesn't get added. Chicken-egg problem...! -
@thisismissem mastodon is acting as the activitypub client here, so mastodon api clients won't have to do anything
-
@trwnh sorry, I meant other consumers of AP data
-
@thisismissem well, you either understand the old mastodon format or you understand the new fep format or you understand both or you understand neither.
old: you will ignore Note/Link attachments
new but not old: you will ignore the invalid PropertyValue attachments
new and old: you deduplicate
neither: ignore everything in attachment
