Explaining the fediverse is a hard problem.
-
I do agree that the term "federation" and the use of the verb "to federate" (with its even weirder bastard cousin "defederate", which is not even a real word) is very unfortunate. It would be great to have a shorter and more fitting term. Something normal people would connect with more easily.
I find it especially problematic because its a word that translates poorly, at least in Danish. The Danish word for "federation" can also be used to mean an organization or association, which leads to further confusion. And the verbs for "to federate" and "to defederate" are also just... awkward and really just translate to "connect" and "stop connection" or something. It's not great.
Not that I have any alternatives to suggest honestly. And let's be real, even if I did, that ship has sailed, unless we can rally a big rebranding effort for the fediverse. Such a thing does not sound easy.
-
Omega,
- the ActivutyPub functionality is optional, so for those not interested its no issue, but looking into the future, developing it now seems 'on the right track'.
- your linguistic comment on federated vs federation, surely its just the past tense?
To use your email example, 'a document has been emailed', is legitimate language, and similar to the reflexive past phrase 'a site has been federated'?
A link has been linked, a download was downloaded etc
-
Hey, In reverse I do the replying
- There was no cognitive model for the word "federated" in my head. Nothing happens when I read it. Federation. Federal. No problem here.
I genuinely never encountered the "past tense" of the word until Activity Pub hit the scene and nothing happens, no connection. If I am the dull. So be it. You know. This is really the marketing point or the communication point.
Guess what, federated still doesn't click, it is a mental block, I haven't gotten to the bit where I have the physical analogue for federated. Say for example after we get over the amazeballs of email, then we come across the CC or BCC, wow a mass mail out, basically wow that's cool, oh what there is junk mail too? All these existing real world analoges perfect communicated in a few words or just word, the matching precedence and experience.
Federated. None. The email is example is used, I had to read it twice, I got ti the second time, but the engine still don't start. No fire lit. We're talking the light bulb moment 9and this is very different to the multitude of technical lightbulbs the tec/dev will encounter, the end user in the main, will not care to know as they will never have time to know, that's mass market)
- I'm just vining off the idea, how to explain it not the technical choices. However, we do live with it on community in the raw state, so there is that and I have reposeded to that. I suggested a filter or two types of modes iirc, I'll have to dig out that topic. Sunglasses or no sunglasses browsing.
What I need to do is set up activity pub technically on something somewhere to enjoy the whole, to take the next step whenever that happens.
I dunno yet if Activitypub is "wouldn't' it be cool if..." or "how did we do x to get to y before we had z, I'll never know!", the later is pending the former not unusual to be consigned to the due heap of thing time forgot.
Additionally, there are now people who have completed grown up in a dn live live to much in cyberspace and cyberspace is actually retarding real space IMHO, the problems of cyberspace do not necessarily solve the problem of living space as much as they use to (mail > email). I think we're at a point where the things we engage and do are consuming more than it is now returning, and Ai is a clear milestone on that front.
Broad points, but here is the challenge, explain Acitivyt Pub in 20 maybe 30 words, within or not a NodeBB context, or both.
How about that as a challenge?
-
Sans researching this more, how about this:
In a field I shout @person who I know is in another field. I can not see them as they are far away, but they hear me and can reply and I hear them, in a world of separated fields distance is zero using @[email protected] under activity pub
Does this work? I can't tell... you tell me.
-
@[email protected] said in Explaining the fediverse is a hard problem.:
<p><span><a href="/user/bean%40uvix.cc">@<span>bean</span></a></span><span> </span><span><a href="https://community.nodebb.org/user/julian">@<span>julian</span></a></span><span> </span></p><blockquote><span>And the problem is that people don't get how a Facebook post could be a Tweet. And even if they can get that, it's more confusing how a Reddit post could be an Instagram post. </span></blockquote><span>The thing that gets me is how people don't grok this. It's still weird to me that so much of the Internet has become closed off. Growing up with email, forums, and IRC, it seems only natural that the internet is modular and portable.<br /><br />And the kicker is, even people on the Fediverse have this centralized model for how it works in their mind. People behave as if everything lives in some central place, and that their chosen instance is just some kind of dumb terminal with a window. You can see it when people talk about blocking users or even other instances at the server level -- people react as if they're arbitrarily being denied access to some part of this central repository by some lording gatekeeper, rather than witnessing a website owner or community refusing to host content from actors they don't want to platform.</span><p></p>
I think the only problem here is you assume people should be able to "grok" it. Most people didn't actually grow up in those other "fields", forums IRC etc. etc.
In fact tech has moved on so much that people need to think zero about how things work they just work - magic, you can thank Apple or not for that approach but they understand their users bases and all segments and when you want to cast the widest net you need everyone to be able to use your product without a bad experience - this is where the tech has simply evolved into an appliance to the user, like a microwave, not hard to use, easy to understand without having a clue about magnetrons or the birth of radar, but we can tell each other the anecdote about the scientist whose mars bar melting in his pocket was the inspiration for the microwave to use it to hear food (even if that that story is true or a modern myth) it doesn't matter, we all stand back a few feet from the brrrrr'ing microwaves until the dish is done! Just in case, so often more than not, we understand how the tech works better through the danger of it than anything else!
So really, I think it is perfectly normal for people not to get this. If we orientate around this truth then you can solve the problem you perceive.
The clue is in the title of the OP
@baris @julian a gentle FYA note on the nested quote not happening.
-
@[email protected] said in Explaining the fediverse is a hard problem.:
And the problem is that people don't get how a Facebook post could be a Tweet. And even if they can get that, it's more confusing how a Reddit post could be an Instagram post.
This is a good observation and anecdote, but do they have to get it?
They only have to get it if they want it, if they want to do it.
Why would they want to do this?
Perhaps you are encountering an unarticulated confusion they are experiencing as you try to explain it. In their mind they are thinking, but sure wy would i need this, I have insta, all my buds are there.
Habits are powerful and once people are locked into a platform they are sticky, they leave they are usually gone for good. It's all or nothing most of the time.
Early adoption is invariably more miss than hit and is not the preserve of the masses.
I cite Apple again, they learned this, they wait till things mature and there is a decent enough desire. Their latest headset is a good example. They might be pushing their wait envelope on this but they did wait. Whereas others were out of the gates years before, in fact the idea has been around for decades.
VR is one of the harder sells, and ActivityPub may be the VR of online content creation.
Does the ordinary person even think of themselves as a "content creator" they really don't, they think of themselves as themselves (if posting under their real name or at least photo, and then even as a non they still are themselves most of the time) That's the majority of people. They want to express as is there want in the moment, they get the likes and insights, feedback or whatever and they feel a positive feedback or some worth and value to their actions - is amplifying that across disparate platforms something they really need?
If they do not need it, then they do not need to get it.
... enter stage left MARKETING!
-
I accept your challenge to explain the utility in 20 words. Ironic challenge as your posts are lengthy literary masterpieces
So under 20 words with practical example
I already use Mastodon as apposed to Twitter so Im onboard. @[email protected]
-
@eeeee
Ah worked this time! -
Honestly I think that if interoperability between different types of federated platforms Just Worked people would "understand" it more intuitively, because they'd see it in action instead of it having to be explained to them as an abstract concept.
I'm a fairly tech-savvy user, and I perfectly understand what federation is and how it works on a technical level, but even I find the UI aspects often confusing or downright impossible to figure out.
For example, I saw this thread from my Mastodon client because I followed the ActivityPub topic on this forum from my Mastodon account. In my Mastodon client the posts appear as boosts, but mostly with broken HTML formatting. I clicked through to this forum to read the thread properly. I then wanted to "like" / +1 a post, so I copied the permalink into my Mastodon client like I would for a post on a different Mastodon instance, but it couldn't find anything. In the end I had to log into my local account on this forum instead.Don't get me wrong, the UI problems are very difficult to get right. But I think they're more important than documentation. When it Just Works, people will grok it and documentation/explanation won't be needed.
-
@julian Here's the one I saw today: https://indieweb.social/@[email protected]/113101718634936122
However, I now see that the broken HTML appears in the original post on this forum, so it's not a federation problem. Apologies for the 'false alarm' on that aspect. I've definitely seen broken formatting before, but haven't clicked through to check where the issue was. I'll keep an eye out for it again.
That said, my point was mainly about the difficulty of actually working out how to interact with posts from a different instance (especially one running different software), rather than about the actual content of the federated messages.
