Lots of great updates in the latest Mastodon release, but I am particularly excited about this.
-
@raphael @stefan @deadsuperhero
Then you haven’t looked very far.
I’ve seen entire instances where most of the users are either on disability or otherwise living below the poverty level.
Paywalling one of the few non evil social media sites is a great way to force the impoverished into even further social isolation or into one of the lesser but at least still free options and away from here. -
@Alien_Sunset @stefan @deadsuperhero
The idea is not to paywall everything, but to push the message that (1) the Fediverse can only become a viable alternative if the *majority* of people provide material support paying for its operational costs and R&D; and (2) corporate networks that are "free" are actually exploiting you in ways that extract a lot more than a few dollars per year.
-
Raphael Lullisreplied to Raphael Lullis last edited by
@Alien_Sunset @stefan @deadsuperhero
Even if "entire instances" of impoverished people exist , it would stand to reason that they are not representative of the median user.
The median user *can* pay, but they don't. Currently ~2% of the users contribute to their instances. It could be a lot higher than this.
We could still provide assistance or exemptions for anyone that asks, or create a "sponsor" program where people can contribute a little extra to pay for those can not afford it.
-
Raphael Lullisreplied to Raphael Lullis last edited by
@Alien_Sunset @stefan @deadsuperhero
My whole argument is that "default to free (as in beer)" may seem like a good deed, but it has terrible consequences.
- It puts developers and enthusiasts of FOSS on equal footing with trillion dollar corporations who can afford to run these projects at a loss.
- It robs of the opportunity to "vote with our wallet" and support projects.
- It completely prioritizes quantity over quality, and appeals to the lowest common denominator.
-
Raphael Lullisreplied to Raphael Lullis last edited by [email protected]
@Alien_Sunset @stefan @deadsuperhero
I think that someone smarter than me will someday prove the link between the rise of populism and this homogenization of mass communication networks.
It's just impossible for quality journalism to exist in a world where we measure and reward work by the amount of eyeballs that it attracts, and a sure way to keep thinking things *should* be free because some people can not afford it.
-
Stefan Bohacekreplied to Raphael Lullis last edited by
@raphael @Alien_Sunset @deadsuperhero
"The median user *can* pay"
I mean that's a bold claim.
- https://archive.ph/kIDuV
- https://www.cnbc.com/2024/05/20/americans-are-going-into-debt-to-buy-groceries-research-finds.htmlYes, this is cherry-picked, and just for the US, but I'd like to see some evidence for your statement.
-
Stefan Bohacekreplied to Stefan Bohacek last edited by
@raphael @Alien_Sunset @deadsuperhero Regardless, I do agree with you on the importance of supporting all the work and paying for all the resources to keep fediverse, and FOSS in general, sustainable.
But there must be better ways. Setting up non-profits, applying for grants, I don't know. Not really my area of expertise. We have to get creative.
-
Raphael Lullisreplied to Stefan Bohacek last edited by [email protected]
@stefan @Alien_Sunset @deadsuperhero
Netflix has 60+ million subscribers in the US. Disney has 50+ million in the US and Canada.
If the *median* American can afford to pay billions of dollars per year for entertainment, they can afford to pay a few million per year for the development of the Commons.
-
Stefan Bohacekreplied to Raphael Lullis last edited by
@raphael @Alien_Sunset @deadsuperhero Right, and the math should add up, but the current state of things is a proof that it doesn't?
Look at how many people were willing to pay for Twitter Blue when it was announced. I wonder what the numbers look like now that they're paywalling more and more of the site's features.
-
Stefan Bohacekreplied to Stefan Bohacek last edited by
@raphael @Alien_Sunset @deadsuperhero It just seems like, asking people to pay for things that they've been used to getting for free for so long is an uphill battle, with most seemingly willing to compromise for a subpar experience, or seek out free alternatives.
Or just get left out from the public discourse.
-
Raphael Lullisreplied to Stefan Bohacek last edited by
@stefan @Alien_Sunset @deadsuperhero
We can not use Twitter Blue conversion rates or anything else based on the "freemium" model if the comparison is against a service that does not have a free tier, but we can prove that Americans (on average) do pay for services when they can not get it for free.
-
Stefan Bohacekreplied to Raphael Lullis last edited by
@raphael @Alien_Sunset @deadsuperhero Right. And fair enough.
-
@stefan @raphael @deadsuperhero Are there any servers out there with an ad-supported model right now?
I've got nothing against it, and maybe it's because I have no frame of reference for how profitable any sort of ad is in 2024- but do non-invasive/non-targeted ads actually make a reasonable amount of money?
-
@tom @raphael @deadsuperhero I don't know about any.
I know that https://500.social is one example of a paid instance, but that's done via Patreon.
-
@raphael @stefan @deadsuperhero
Using a predatory practice as an example of something to aim for or to prove that people being forced to pay for one service can ‘obviously’ pay for *another* service on top of it is not as convincing as you think
-
@raphael @stefan @deadsuperhero
Well, yeah, but once again, paywalling such a necessary thing like social media seems kinda … sleezy, yeah, the people who can afford it will pay, and so will a portion of people who technically *cant* afford it but still need it, and… what? The rest can go wither and die? (Hyperbolic, yes, but my point stands)
-
@Alien_Sunset @stefan @deadsuperhero
What is predatory about streaming services?
You have the full right to not like them, but to claim that people are simply paying out of coercion is absurd. When piracy is still an alternative (and arguably even morally justified), it's hard not to see how people pay for these services because they value their convenience above all else.
-
@Alien_Sunset @stefan @deadsuperhero
> people who technically *cant* afford it but still need it, and… what?
Then we will have a secondary market which is not super attractive for the Surveillance Capitalism corporations and that can be served by secondary players: local libraries, schools... and yes, even ad-supported businesses, like a regional newspaper.
-
@raphael @stefan @deadsuperhero
Library run social media sites? SCHOOL run social media sites? On the tiny assed budgets that they are already forced to work with?
Are you on crack?
-
@raphael @stefan @deadsuperhero
Although it does raise an interesting possibility… socialised social media, much like healthcare is necessary for physical health and should also be something funded by everyone and managed by an “impartial” entity rather than one focused on profits perhaps social media should go a similar route….
1/?