I understand that you want to emphasize that your open source project has lots of financial backers.

[wordshaper@weatherishappening.network]

@jalefkowit At least it's pretty clear what the project's useful for so... yay? I guess?

[jalefkowit@vmst.io]

@wordshaper The strange thing is that it's a perfectly cromulent general-purpose tool, there's nothing about it that is specific to online gaming or shady social network scamming. It just happens to have attracted lots of financial support from those worlds.

[jalefkowit@vmst.io]

"Nonono, our sponsor is LEGAL Casino." Oh ok. That sounds legit

[jalefkowit@vmst.io]

My retirement plan involves putting everything on red at Casino Without Swedish License

[itamarst@hachyderm.io]

@jalefkowit @wordshaper Might be SEO "pay-for-links" thing from the perspective of the sponsors?

[jalefkowit@vmst.io]

@itamarst @wordshaper Quite possibly! But offering the project's website as a cheap way to scam search engines wouldn't exactly fill me with confidence in the project either

[dustin@linernotes.club]

@jalefkowit what on earth...a PRNG package or...

[jalefkowit@vmst.io]

@dustin I'd post a link, but it's a JavaScript library and in my experience critiquing a JavaScript library is construed as an open invitation for people to suggest ten thousand indistinguishable alternative JavaScript libraries

[glyph@mastodon.social]

@jalefkowit is this real

[jalefkowit@vmst.io]

@glyph Yep. I’m not nearly creative enough to come up with names like “Casino Without Swedish License”