I just sent the final proofs of the #ActivityPub book to the editors at O'Reilly.

Matt Keeter

@evan I'm surprised to see this level of hostility from you!

I really enjoyed your "Big Fedi, Small Fedi" post, and from reading their architecture docs, Bluesky is genuinely designed to address some of the "big fedi" challenges that you pointed out.

If you believe that Bluesky is inherently bad because it completes with ActivityPub, that's fine, but the level of FUD in this thread is disappointing.

Evan Prodromou

@mjk I care a lot about the social web. I do not want to see its growth stunted by competition at the protocol level at this crucial time.

If you found something untrue in what I said above, please let me know. I'm happy to correct it.

damon

@everton137 you can take a look at these https://atproto.com/guides/faq#why-not-use-activitypub https://fed.brid.gy/docs#compare

Evan Prodromou

@mjk Here are a couple of links to give an idea of how I feel about BS and other proprietary social networking protocols.

https://prodromou.pub/@evan/110045336289311841

http://evanp.me/2023/10/06/activitypub-the-socialcg-and-the-social-web/

Steve Bate

@jerome @evan @everton137 Yeah, those Fedidb numbers are difficult to reconcile... it shows 1.5MM new users are since July, but only 100K increase in MAU? You'd expect at least the newly joined users to be included in MAU. ‍️

julian

@[email protected] not necessarily... setting aside the fact that the numbers themselves might not be right (because numbers are hard, people!!), new user counts without a corresponding MAU increase can be explained by large new instances joining the fediverse.

e.g. when Flipboard opened up their entire network to the fediverse, that would show up as a huge number of newly added users, but a great majority of them wouldn't be active due to churn.

Steve Bate

@julian Given the "monthly" granularity, I'd *expect* that a user joining would count as activity in that month period even if there's churn in the next month. The August data is showing about 400K new users and about 40K active users (90% of new users are not considered active in the month they join?). Seems strange to me, but I agree nobody knows if these numbers are accurate or meaningful. I see reason for skepticism.

julian

@[email protected] of course! That's perfectly reasonable.

If FediDB captured my forum's nodeinfo for the first time, they'd see this:

usage:
    users:
        total: 25698
        activeMonth: 197
        activeHalfyear: 952

Depending on how you consider the "joined" action to be counted, FediDB could consider this as 25.6k joined users, but only an MAU increase of ~200.

Steve Bate

@julian Yeah, that's seems wrong if I'm understanding you. Given "joined" is not explicitly reported, it's probably taking the previous month's total and the current month and computing the different in total users (where a positive number is considered "joined"). They should wait at least one month to report those numbers to avoid artificially inflating the stats.

toolbear#🪧

@evan @everton137
I found David Gerard's take on the politics of Dorsey as it relates to BS to be a useful listen in this #TechWontSaveUs podcast episode:

https://techwontsave.us/episode/228_jack_dorseys_embrace_of_crypto_libertarianism_w_david_gerard

TL;DL — Dorsey also wants a network for free speech absolutists and BS eventually caved to reality and implemented moderation, so the project is dead to Dorsey now (who went out of his way to keep white supremacists platformed on Twitter)