Honestly, if you’re in the US, please vote.
-
George Maschkereplied to Mastodon Migration last edited by
@mastodonmigration @barney I can see how one might argue that. But as I see things, whether Harris or Trump wins, the plight of the Palestinians will in all likelihood be similarly bleak.
-
@gwm @benroyce @barney @firebreathingduck @GreenFire @fiberologist @WAHa_06x36 @Gargron his statements in favor of the genocide of Israelis
I'm weird that way
-
Mastodon Migrationreplied to George Maschke last edited by
So this then becomes the crux of the decision. You have to believe that neither candidate will make a difference to the people you are supporting. It should be clear that Netanyahu, at least, thinks very differently. Also, as shown above, Trump has told him he will be free to "do whatever he wants" whereas Harris has been telegraphing a much different message. It seems like holding to the position they are both the same is very difficult given what we know about these two people.
-
George Maschkereplied to Mastodon Migration last edited by
@mastodonmigration @barney On Palestine, Trump and Harris are sufficiently alike that I did not find it reasonable to cast my ballot for Harris based on the hope that she might somehow be better.
-
@Amoshias @benroyce @barney @firebreathingduck @GreenFire @fiberologist @WAHa_06x36 @Gargron I am not aware of any statement by Butch Ware supporting the genocide of any people.
-
Mastodon Migrationreplied to George Maschke last edited by
That is, of course, up to you to decide, but it seems like a very difficult argument to sustain given the respective public positions. On the one hand Trump is saying to Netanyahu he will permit him do anything he wants. On the other Harris is saying she will do everything she can to end the war. The difference in indeed significant.
Seems like you need to believe that she lacks all sincerity to conclude they are both the same.
-
@gwm @benroyce @barney @firebreathingduck @GreenFire @fiberologist @WAHa_06x36 @Gargron you don't seem to be aware of anything that goes against your preferred narrative.
That's unusual.
-
@Amoshias @gwm @barney @firebreathingduck @GreenFire @fiberologist @WAHa_06x36 @Gargron
the account is bot-like
they pick up a gist of a comment, and reply with well known boilerplate disinfo talking points, with flat emotional effect, like reading off a list
the account simply ignores any point that renders their lies evident. even if repeated
beyond dishonesty, that points to a behavior pattern which is cold influence operation rather than genuine human being trying to engage
-
Raccoon at TechHub :mastodon:replied to BattleBot23 last edited by
@bot23 @gwm @ducksauz @WAHa_06x36 @johnstonphilip @benroyce @Mourioche
At the end of the day, there are things we can get and things we can't get. That is a problem with the two-party system, which I think we can get rid of within the next decade or so if we can just elect Kamala Harris this time. The choice is between more genocide, on top of all the other horrible things Trump and his allies are promising to do, and a path to peace, on top of all the other positive things that Harris offers.Once again, the difference is night and day.
People cannot be sitting this election out.
-
@benroyce @Amoshias @barney @firebreathingduck @GreenFire @fiberologist @WAHa_06x36 @Gargron You don't really think I'm a bot, do you? I'm posting here with my real name. You can Google me, and even call if you like (I'm gwm.11 on Signal).
-
@gwm @Amoshias @barney @firebreathingduck @GreenFire @fiberologist @WAHa_06x36 @Gargron
you elicit a patterrn of behavior which is indicative of your motivations
i have multiply stated the value of a 3rd party vote in an fptp voting system- it divides the left and helps trump win
you just ignore it
because you're not interested in honest engagement
you're interested in shilling talking points
so you are an operator as part of an agenda not a genuine person sharing your honest views
-
@benroyce @Amoshias @barney @firebreathingduck @GreenFire @fiberologist @WAHa_06x36 @Gargron No, I just happen to think you're wrong about third parties. While they may attract some voters away from the candidates of the duopoly, they also attract persons who would not otherwise vote. That someone may have a different view than you does not entail that they are arguing in bad faith, or must somehow be a foreign agent.
-
@gwm @benroyce @Amoshias @barney @firebreathingduck @GreenFire @fiberologist @WAHa_06x36 @Gargron
So are you pushing for third party at the school board level? City council? State level?
There is no point to a third party president if she immediately would have to turn to one of the two parties to get literally anything done.
Third parties take work at the bottom. Top down approaches have never worked. I don't know that a single example exists of it working.
-
@Beachhart @benroyce @Amoshias @barney @firebreathingduck @GreenFire @fiberologist @WAHa_06x36 @Gargron I support third party candidates in local elections as well.
-
@gwm @benroyce @Amoshias @barney @firebreathingduck @GreenFire @fiberologist @WAHa_06x36 @Gargron
Good. Then if you can be pragmatic, you should be pragmatic here and vote Harris at the top of the ticket.
This is not the election to fuck around with. If Trump is elected you won't get to vote third party again. Or at all.
-
@Beachhart @benroyce @Amoshias @barney @firebreathingduck @GreenFire @fiberologist @WAHa_06x36 @Gargron Trump was elected before, and he was voted out of office after four years. I think the situation is not so dire as you suggest.
-
Mastodon Migrationreplied to George Maschke last edited by
@gwm @firebreathingduck @benroyce @barney @GreenFire @fiberologist @WAHa_06x36
These are all lofty sounding phases, but earlier today you settled on the rationale that you did not think either candidate would be better for Palestinians. You don't seem to be able to sustain that point in light of all the evidence to the contrary, so you are back to word salad. The truth is you're putting the people you profess to support at risk of more harm, and no principles are going to change that.
-
I have been voting in the primaries, and I'll continue to. But in the general? No. Not if the person in the general election is all in on war, oil, and oligarchy.
-
you vote in both
because you're smart enough (right?) to understand if the GOP wins it will be even worse
it is about moving in a direction, not standing at perfect and crossing your arms and pouting until the world magically matches your ideology
you are doing nothing but articulating a rationale for impotence
-
Raccoon at TechHub :mastodon:replied to Eugen Rochko last edited by
@Gargron
As Server Staff and people who are trying to grow the Fediverse, we need to come out and be clear about this: a Trump presidency will not only be disastrous for the country, but for the Fediverse itself, and democratic and pro-free-speech movements in general.It has been made clear that Trump WILL give Elon Musk, the very person many people came here to get away from, direct influence over the FCC and FEC, regulatory agencies which are not only critical to the operation of a free and fair internet, but which have the ability to directly threaten our American servers and staff members.
If the US citizens here do not get out and VOTE FOR KAMALA HARRIS, we are going to see a LOT of problems for the network.
And if y'all have friends who may be on the fence, go talk to them, offer to go to the polls with them, do whatever it takes to get as many of our fellow US Citizens to get out and VOTE FOR KAMALA HARRIS as possible!
