It's a big club, and YOU ain't in it.
-
People like you are dangerous to those of us actually trying to make a positive change. You’d sell out your fellow man to the elites if push came to shove and we can sense that cowardice in you. Don’t expect us to be stoked about traitors. If you don’t want to help then at least get out of the fucking way.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
This is not about defending billionaires, this is about condemning murder as a matter of principle!
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
A CEO was "murdering" with debts before and after, call me when something actually changes.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Actively killing someone =/= someone dying by an avoidable cause of death
The legal system isn't created by the rich. Sure they can afford lawyers and have a higher influence in politics. The country is still a democracy but the people have to vote in their best interest to get better healthcare. Systematic change is needed, so the root cause. You could say by killing this guy all you're doing is trying to treat a symptom of a broken system, even tho I would say his death doesn't even fully do that. Its just one more death. An avoidable and unnecessary death. I don't claim his corporate policies but murder like this has no place in a democracy with rule of law to change things. If a CEO started looking out for the best health of the customer it would be against the interest of the shareholder as it would make the company less profitable. A systematic change like unified public healthcare is needed. No private entities. No healthcare shouldn't be tied to work.
You can't claim moral superiority while promoting murder.
-
So you can applaud that this topic has come to focus of the public without celebrating a murder right?
-
[email protected]replied to Queen HawlSera last edited by
The company and system at large remains the same
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Elect representatives and use non-violent acts to shape public perception so the law is changed. If it is legal and he isn't actively like murdering/torturing people I don't think you can really argue he should be imprisoned. Just my take. Also, there are no "good people" and "bad people". Its not black and white.
-
Yet again claiming moral righteousness while promoting murder. Positive change will come through democratic and legislative change. Violence leads to chaos and disturbance. When people like you come to power they use everything to undermine and disrupt critics. How can you label a person a traitor simply for disagreeing with violence? Every single country that became communist has just created a new elite and ruling class. Don't pretend you're the good one.
-
You’re an idiot.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
The principle being complete subservience to a group of wall street military and prison industry profiteers who have used their wealth to hijack our social institutions, our representatives and transformed the vast majority of news media in our country into propaganda dissemination outlets While also enforcing a system that legislates and bureaucratically incentivizes the deaths of poor and working class people including American citizens for profit while denying the reality that this is called social murder and is murder none the less. A principle completely lacking in principle. Id love to know what you consider to be moral with principles such as those.
-
Come to Germany. We had a wealth tax until 1996 and whenever it's revival is publicly discussed you can see that the majority is against it even when the majority of our people would never have to pay it and would profit from it. It's mind boggling that the people are still willing to defend our current "don't tax the rich" policy...
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I think they way most people see it is that anyone in their right mind has a point where murder is okay. WWII, for example - the vast majority of people understand it was okay to kill Nazis. The context was that the world had no choice but to go to war with them. It was either kill or be killed.
We're in the same situation here in the United States. Our political system is broken. Politicians are bought and sold by the 1%, and they will continue to kill us en masse no matter how many peaceful protests we join and whoever we vote for.
-
Username fucking checks out.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
You can see some in this very thread
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Nobody will actually change anything for you, unless you work on it. All of you, all of us collectively. I'm calling you now, do something.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
And I will vote for change. And I ask you to do the same.
-
Yeah the whole AfD situation is extremely worrying to me.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
You don't have to pick a side. You could just say Brian Thompson deserved to die and that Luigi Mangione should see trial and possibly imprisonment.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
So they're in the room with us right now? Can you describe them to us?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Ot only is it that murder is ok for everyone at a certain point but its that we are conditioned to praise retributive violence and killing so long as the ones being beaten maimed and or killed are marginalized people whom the ultra wealthy see as sub human and their casualty benefit their end goals. Like all the non violent labor and civil rights protestors who have ended up bludgeoned by batons and less than lethal munitions, or targeted by extra judicial unconstitutional surveillance and suppression tactics such as yale used against pro Palestinian demonstrators over the last year. There are too many examples of this double standard to go over without writing a book as thick as the king james Bible.