Moderators banning/censoring people arent oppressors violating your rights; they are customer service representatives curating the space for their intended costomers. All this to say, I see Karen.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Influence, narrative-control, hurting the other tribe, control over a little domain. Those are good pay for some people.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
But if they're saying the wrong stuff then I get to hit them with my modhammer. Right?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
So you want to shape us.
How about just letting us talk?
-
be in the community but secretly ...
Oh that will work out just fine.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I'm not a mod
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Disregarding the power of "influence" in the modern day is so absurd, honestly.
-
[email protected]replied to AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet last edited by
Did you just call me stupid! O_o you heartless beast.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Most conversations on the internet are worthless or I would even attribute negative value to many of them.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I'm fine with it, but me personally, am also fine leaving communities when they have stopped being useful and become belligerent, like you're describing.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
But it's a very good guideline for people who, like moderators, have power and imperfect understanding. It's saying, "when in doubt, err on the side of least possible harm". So that's a good guide. Right?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
What if they got off topic. What would happen?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Generally yes, but I feel a lot of people will assume their grievance is some sort of gray area that needs this type of consideration when it's most likely not.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
here, how to speak then
You missed a closing delimiter on the subclause. Is that still acceptable speech for you?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Do we count 'nametag' jobs of the late '80s? If so, then I'm in!
-
Well, that's the problem.
Karen is just an excuse to call women something without having the guts to be up front about it.
Originally, it was about a specific kind of entitled behavior. But it turned into a generic misogynist term like bitch used to be.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Actually it ain't. Good, catch
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Well there is no clean connection between the rule and reality (short of forbidden word lists anyway). It's always a matter of somebody's interpretation.
Some communities have rules like "don't be a dick", which seems implied.
Maybe rules are inappropriate here. At best a justification.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Most? Well not my conversations.
Maybe it's a smalltalk vs "largetalk" thing. Maybe most conversations are smalltalk. Talk that's just friendly noise or whatever.
That is a territory with which I am pretty unfamiliar.
But ya, 2 totally different kinds of talk.
Maybe trolling constitutes a 3rd variety.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
But you uttered an opinion about moderation. So don't dodge my point.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I mod [email protected]