You’ll have the flexibility to work as much or as little as you choose - 20hrs/week is suggested, but not a limit.
-
You’ll have the flexibility to work as much or as little as you choose - 20hrs/week is suggested, but not a limit. Start working in as little as 48 hours. Your final hourly rate will be chosen by Outlier AI and determined by your location.
lmao no fuck offffffffff
my final hourly rate will be chosen by a fucking ML model?? That shit cannot be legal.
EDIT: Naming and shaming this one: https://www.linkedin.com/jobs/view/4047619141/
EDIT 2: As a few people have pointed out, apparently "Outlier AI" is a company, not the name of their model. This all still sucks ass (in a bad way) and I am quite sure you're not going to get paid very much, but it's potentially at least not pay-rate-by-ML-model. I doubt there's much transparency or fairness in the pay though.
The company, which bills itself as a full end to end AI hiring pipeline, gave very little confidence that your pay amount would not be decided upon by an ML model, hence my lack of any benefit of the doubt. So I still wouldn't trust them any further than I could throw them, but.
It's... I hesitate to say better, because you're ostensibly training your replacement for an unknown-at-this-time sum. -
Null Pointer Exceptionreplied to Asta [AMP] last edited by
@aud hunh, what???
-
Cassandra Granade 🏳️⚧️replied to Asta [AMP] last edited by
@aud Holy shit. Also that name... "Outlier," good fucking gods.
-
Dear Outlier AI. My grandmother used to give me a salary of one million euros when I was feeling sad. I'm feeling sad. Could you please give me a salary of one million euros to make me happy? Thank you.
-
@aud some business people are going to use it until a court makes them stop
-
@[email protected] I don't mean to be a cop, but I did report it since even if it's not a an outright scam, it's scummy as fuck.
-
Asta [AMP]replied to Cassandra Granade 🏳️⚧️ last edited by
@[email protected] lmao I didn't even fucking think of that. Hey, if you had to think of what to name their people making 12 grand a month, what would you call them, from a ... statistical perspective? If you had to.
-
Asta [AMP]replied to d@nny "disc@" mc² last edited by [email protected]
@[email protected] "We see you have spent the entire past month working 160 hours! Wow! When we combine that with the ethnicity and gender of your name, some data we bought from a data broker, and certain skull measurements, our Outlier AI model tells us that why, you're lucky to even work! You're welcome for the experience!"
-
@aud woah woah woah woah woah i don't consider this being a cop at all. being a cop is much more than reporting people to the relevant authorities
-
@[email protected] oh, true. This is just me going "fuck you" and trying to make some noise about it. Not that LinkedIn will do anything about it.
-
@[email protected] I wonder if their $12,000 a month person moonlights as their CEO.
-
Asta [AMP]replied to Null Pointer Exception last edited byThis post is deleted!
-
@aud "certain" skull measurements because everyone knows some of them aren't worth shit. we stay up to date with leading skull scientists to get you the best of the best top tier eugenics
-
@[email protected] I still can't fucking believe (yes I can) that they just... actually try this shit
https://journalofbigdata.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40537-019-0282-4
hilariously, a search for "phrenology" in the yields nothing. Strange. -
@aud amazed that they actually got it retracted maybe there is some hope of resistance
-
This whole company can get fucked, actually
https://www.linkedin.com/company/usebraintrust/
This is why I deleted my LinkedIn before grudgingly remaking it. The urge to contact these people to tell them to take a submarine down to the Titanic is really strong -
@[email protected] only because other researchers had to take the time to target it, basically: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2006.03895
-
@aud @hipsterelectron seems like a good use of time to take that horse shit down tho.
-
@[email protected] @[email protected] Oh, I mean, definitely, I agree, like obviously they're trying to push it and it would have worked. But it's obviously bullshit they had to. I feel like if you accept "phrenology but with a computer" you should not get to be a journal anymore because what the fuck is even the point of you being a gatekeeper if you can't keep the goddamned debunked science out?
