You’ll have the flexibility to work as much or as little as you choose - 20hrs/week is suggested, but not a limit.
-
@aud some business people are going to use it until a court makes them stop
-
@[email protected] I don't mean to be a cop, but I did report it since even if it's not a an outright scam, it's scummy as fuck.
-
Asta [AMP]replied to Cassandra Granade 🏳️⚧️ last edited by
@[email protected] lmao I didn't even fucking think of that. Hey, if you had to think of what to name their people making 12 grand a month, what would you call them, from a ... statistical perspective? If you had to.
-
Asta [AMP]replied to d@nny "disc@" mc² last edited by [email protected]
@[email protected] "We see you have spent the entire past month working 160 hours! Wow! When we combine that with the ethnicity and gender of your name, some data we bought from a data broker, and certain skull measurements, our Outlier AI model tells us that why, you're lucky to even work! You're welcome for the experience!"
-
@aud woah woah woah woah woah i don't consider this being a cop at all. being a cop is much more than reporting people to the relevant authorities
-
@[email protected] oh, true. This is just me going "fuck you" and trying to make some noise about it. Not that LinkedIn will do anything about it.
-
@[email protected] I wonder if their $12,000 a month person moonlights as their CEO.
-
Asta [AMP]replied to Null Pointer Exception last edited byThis post is deleted!
-
@aud "certain" skull measurements because everyone knows some of them aren't worth shit. we stay up to date with leading skull scientists to get you the best of the best top tier eugenics
-
@[email protected] I still can't fucking believe (yes I can) that they just... actually try this shit
https://journalofbigdata.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40537-019-0282-4
hilariously, a search for "phrenology" in the yields nothing. Strange. -
@aud amazed that they actually got it retracted maybe there is some hope of resistance
-
This whole company can get fucked, actually
https://www.linkedin.com/company/usebraintrust/
This is why I deleted my LinkedIn before grudgingly remaking it. The urge to contact these people to tell them to take a submarine down to the Titanic is really strong -
@[email protected] only because other researchers had to take the time to target it, basically: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2006.03895
-
@aud @hipsterelectron seems like a good use of time to take that horse shit down tho.
-
@[email protected] @[email protected] Oh, I mean, definitely, I agree, like obviously they're trying to push it and it would have worked. But it's obviously bullshit they had to. I feel like if you accept "phrenology but with a computer" you should not get to be a journal anymore because what the fuck is even the point of you being a gatekeeper if you can't keep the goddamned debunked science out?
-
I've seen them. Researched a bit. Stayed away.
-
This post is deleted!
-
We _already_ have this problem
Much easier to generate bullshit than to refute it; it's 2nd law of thermodynamics all the way down
-
@aud @hipsterelectron @cthos Just suggesting anything vaguely adjacent to phrenology should be a lifetime ban from publishing in any journal or holding professorship at any university worldwide.
