It's 2024, do you have IPv6 single-stack hosts on your network yet?
-
Malte Stretzreplied to John Marion :donor: last edited by
@jmarion
My backend web and mail servers are IPv6-only. -
John Marion :donor:replied to Malte Stretz last edited by
@mss This sounds like the easiest candidates to convert to v6 single-stack! "eyeballs" computers seem more difficult because there are still services that don't have IPv6 service at all
-
John Marion :donor:replied to Alex Haydock last edited by
@alexhaydock I started this with my dedicated NFS VLANs, link-local networks feel like a good v6-single-stack candidate when possible.
-
Alex Haydockreplied to John Marion :donor: last edited by
@jmarion I’ve found it surprisingly usable for regular endpoints too, apart from a few niche issues involving apps using v4 literals, which can be worked out with NAT64 and a CLAT.
Apple’s CLAT implementation is the gold standard, and Microsoft seem to be bringing it to W11. Now I guess we just wait for someone to build a systemd-clatd or something similar
-
-
Chris runs 🏃 🐧replied to John Marion :donor: last edited by
-
@cr @jmarion yes, the #NAT64 is on my #CPE. #DNS64 is only needed for #linux and #windows. The rest already uses the #PREF64 announcement and setups up a #CLAT.
There is already a DRAFT to deprecate RFC7050 for discovery. See https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-buraglio-deprecate7050/ @forwardingplane -
@goetz @cr @forwardingplane I'll definitely be looking into this
-
@chrysn @jmarion openwrt is maybe 6 clicks and a bit copy paste. But works fine. Is easy controllable. Thanks to the great pre-work by @Oskar456
https://openwrt.org/docs/guide-user/network/ipv6/nat64 -
@alexhaydock @jmarion we need all the #redhat customers to up vote the #ipv6only feature in the roadmap.
-
-
@goetz @jmarion Time to plug this: https://nat64.xyz/
-
