Regular reminder that Bluesky is a VC-funded company which inevitably is headed for the same fate shared by all VC-funded companies. It must maintain hypergrowth until it either:
-
@yosh This is why I love the fediverse. Built from the ground up, grassroots. We have to figure out how to pay for things as we go. Not saying things are perfect here, or that there aren't struggles.
But not having to go into debt for any of this is pretty neat.
-
-
@yosh if your principled stance is against all companies which take investment, then sure, that is a consistent reason to distrust Bluesky. being a Public Benefit Corporation is nice-to-have but is pretty unproven and far from being a non-profit.
our goal is to build a system which is resistant to the enshittification cycle, and I think we are well on our way to that goal.
-
@yosh we have demonstrated a lot of core functionality which has been discussed for years but never implemented in other protocols and app ecosystems. even if the whole atproto project implodes, I think it is provided a lot for protocols like AP to learn from (as we have from them).
we are going to try many other business models before ads, and have time/money to do so. our current board has pretty legit folks on it. original funding was a contract for no equity, not VC.
-
-
-
@anvit @yosh what are your goal posts and criteria?
I think atproto is much more than an API. you don't need to talk to any single server. each network service is replaceable and has "exit". sure, not like mastodon.
"why not ActivityPub" is a big topic and hard to boil down, they are very different systems. the shortest answer I have is that AP is very web 2.0 ecosystem and tech, while AT is developed by folks coming from P2P and content addressed ecosystem (SSB, dat, bittorrent, git).
-
@yosh Er, in commercial theory, 'debt' and 'stock' are very different kinds of beasts.
-
Mastodon Migration VOTEDreplied to bryan newbold last edited by
-
bryan newboldreplied to Mastodon Migration VOTED last edited by
@mastodonmigration @yosh we announced we are working on a couple revenue models recently:
we already sell domain names. this is a multi-billion dollar commodity market with great margins.
we are going to do paid subscriptions, where users pay us directly. some just want to support us. can also redistribute to other projects in the ecosystem. similar to discord nitro. "aesthetic flair", not pay-for-ranking.
longer term, we are interested in facilitating payments, like ko-fi/patreon
-
Mastodon Migration VOTEDreplied to bryan newbold last edited by
-
bryan newboldreplied to Mastodon Migration VOTED last edited by [email protected]
@mastodonmigration @yosh what are your assumptions? for the record
-
Mastodon Migration VOTEDreplied to bryan newbold last edited by
You seem like a nice guy, and you probably believe what you are posting. But what you will learn in due course, if you stay in the tech industry, is that money does not work the way you think. Your bosses are lying to you. And if they are not, they are deluded too. When the inevitable parting of ways between the idealistic entrepreneurs and their benevolent benefactor (sarcasm intended) venture capitalists arrives, the money wins. Every time.