I realize that was poor wording, I want to incentivize creators to be able to get paid on the Loops platform, but that is something that requires a lot of careful consideration and consultation with our community.
-
I realize that was poor wording, I want to incentivize creators to be able to get paid on the Loops platform, but that is something that requires a lot of careful consideration and consultation with our community.
While I may explore Nostr support for Loops, ultimately, the community will decide which direction the project heads toward.
Platform owners shouldn't make bank, the content creators should, and will make sure I build this into Loops.
-
When I mentioned cryptocurrency, it felt like grift territory and that's like not the point.
If users want to link to crypto or paypal links, thats fine, but I meant that I want to embrace bigger means of platform monetization and establish the creators fund to manage them.
This means admins being able to charge for IAP for badges to help pay for the service, and pay creators.
-
@dansup generally speaking, I feel like platform operators should get paid, content creators should get paid, software developers should get paid. Everyone should get paid if they're putting in work.
"Ownership" alone should not entitle you to get paid. -
@toychicken amen
-
@dansup think it's a great idea imho. It'll draw talent. It's why YT is so successful and a great way to bridge the gap.
-
LillyLyle/Count Melancholiareplied to dansup last edited by
@dansup I think we should do all we can to keep crypto currency (a synonym for grift) out of the fediverse.
-
@dansup I am all for that the admins of the server should have that option to enable cryptocurrency! Fediverse is for everyone!
