Two in a row! Bingo?
-
replied to [email protected] last edited by
Don't kid yourself, they don't care about trans men. They see them as women and they sure as fuck don't care about women.
-
replied to Deme last edited by
Boeing rn that no one is paying attention to them
-
replied to [email protected] last edited by
Huh, I would've guessed that the big concern if crashes increase would be that more people would die.
Of course, how could I forget about profits! /j
-
replied to [email protected] last edited by
People may die, but CEO's have feelings too! How would you feel if you only earn 200mljn instead of 210. I don't get it why no one ever takes the side of big companies and always look at people suffering by these companies. Oh wait, no, that's not true, most American citizens indeed voted in favor of big companies and CEO's at the cost of the general public. Never mind then.
-
replied to [email protected] last edited by
Doesn't teaching involve learning?
-
replied to [email protected] last edited by
Doesn't matter, the government is there to make sure they can't fail.
-
replied to [email protected] last edited by
Pediatric patient among 6 on plane that crashed in Northeast Philadelphia: 'It was just horrific'
So... A child? What the fuck is this headline?
-
replied to [email protected] last edited by
Trump is about to crash that country with no survivors
-
replied to ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed last edited by
fuck this situation so hard dude. imagine being one of the victims families and seeing your loved one’s lives being used as a pawn to denigrate people of color and the disabled.
my utmost love and sympathy to all involved.
-
replied to ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed last edited by
Could you explain like I’m an idiot how the Bomardier CRJ colliding with a UH60 was the a mechanical or design fault with the Bombardier CRJ? This is an interesting and unique take that I haven’t heard before and I want you to explain it more.
-
replied to Lord Wiggle last edited by
Actually, losing 10m income would be bad. For me, at least, it would put me about 10m in debt.
-
replied to [email protected] last edited by
Well in fairness, if you hurt those industry's with less travel, the people in those industries who end up out of jobs and with no money will die at greater numbers. They would be mostly outside the US though, so this administration doesn't care about that. But at the same time, if they gut the programs in the US that are peoples saftey nets, maybe it will include Americans.
-
replied to [email protected] last edited by
If earning 200m puts you 10m in debt, you're already 210m in debt right now? How did you manage to do that?
-
replied to [email protected] last edited by
Of all the single issue protest votes, I at least respect where the anti genocide bloc is coming from even if I did think their reasoning makes no sense.
At least they're not like the single issue abortion voters who want to make sure that the only way to end a pregnancy viable or otherwise is to kill the mother.
-
replied to [email protected] last edited by
I've not yet had it happen to my family or anyone I know, but there's nothing America would push for if it meant singling out a creed.
COVID-19 was detected in China? Clearly they're disgusting, we need to limit imports! Have fox news make citizens commit hate crimes to any East asian!
Israel is attack Palestinians again? Arab people deserved it for 9/11! Arrest those who want less bloodshed!
Black people are rioting for their rights after murderers getting off scott free? Monsters! TVs are more important than human lives! Fund the police!
9/11 happened? Ban all Arabs! Anyone with a turban is the enemy! Speak American as we erode your rights to catch the next terrorist!
Pearl Harbor?! Detain every Japanese citizen into camps! Steal everything from them and never give it back!
America claims to love freedom and be a melting pot but man does it love to use those for justifying hatred to the current target minority scapegoat of this week's 2 minutes of hate.
-
replied to Lord Wiggle last edited by
Oh no, I mean based on my current income. If I made 10m less than I make now, I'd make about -10m. My yearly income is about 54k, or 0.054m, so subtracting 10m would get me to -9.946m.
I was trying to make a joke about how much 10m is for the average person, yet it's rather minor when you're already making 200m.
-
replied to [email protected] last edited by
But 10m out of 210m is ~5%. In your case 10m is ~2000% so you can't really compare it. If you do want to compare it, it's like you would loose ~5% out of your yearly salary, so 2.7k out of 54k. The question is, would you prefer to trade in 5% of your income for human safety, or do you prefer people to die?
-
replied to Lord Wiggle last edited by
Read that again...
-
replied to Lord Wiggle last edited by
you can't really compare it
My point is that ridiculous difference. 10m is a lot of money, yet these people wouldn't actually lose much because what they have left is still so obscenely much more.