Should a single company control the Social Web?
-
@evan I'm curious what would be the expected result in the same poll in Twitter... (rhetorical question)
-
@lvctvs I don't use X or Bluesky but if you do this poll lmk
-
@virtuous_sloth or mistakes or VCs
-
@hallenbeck I asked something close a few months ago, assuming people want the Social Web to be successful:
Evan Prodromou (@[email protected])
"There can be at most one successful protocol for a given use case." #EvanPoll #poll [ ] Strongly agree [ ] Somewhat agree [ ] Somewhat disagree [ ] Strongly disagree
CoSocial (cosocial.ca)
-
@evan Now let's hear from the other "yes" voters.
-
@evan absolutely when are we creating this fictional company?
-
@elight by other do you mean, other than you?
-
This seems like a lot of Strong Nos.
I'm glad to hear it. I don't think Bluesky, Farcaster, or any other company should convince everyone to use the protocol they control. Their investors have bet that we will.
I like using and contributing to open standards developed in neutral standards bodies like IETF and W3C.
I will not stop saying that open standard protocols are better for the Internet than proprietary ones.
-
Evan Prodromoureplied to Evan Prodromou last edited by [email protected]
I will, however, continue trying to learn how to say this in ways that are clear and comprehensible to listeners and don't push people away.
-
I also think it's *great* when companies implement open standards. That puts them on an even playing field with individuals, families, coops, non-profits, universities, governments, and other parts of civil society. I hope the companies named above find better ways to engage with the wider Internet. I'm happy to help them however I can.
-
Evan Prodromoureplied to Evan Prodromou last edited by [email protected]
I am sad that the ActivityPub network is still vulnerable to this kind of attack.
Protocols like HTTP and TCP/IP are ubiquitous enough that there aren't startups getting funded to create alternatives. ActivityPub is not yet that ubiquitous in its own problem space.
I am taking the news of the funding of Bluesky and others as a wake up call to help build the infrastructure and resources that ActivityPub needs to be the unquestioned default social networking protocol.
-
Khleedrilreplied to Айсылу :comfyreading: :blobfoxwashingmachine: last edited by
@wonderfox_dev @evan Those are lonely attention-seekers. Some even admit as much in the discussion, saying they only voted so others would notice them.
-
@evan We need to keep the successful insertion of inscrutable DRM into official HTML standards by powerful interests top of mind when defending ActivityPub from the corporations at the gate.
-
@khleedril I've had some people get quite angry at me for saying that I don't think a single company should run the Social Web.
I'm glad to know that the resistance is more about how I say it, and not that I say it at all.
-
Evan Prodromoureplied to Evan Prodromou last edited by [email protected]
I don't like conversations about comparing protocols on technical grounds. It's not that I think ActivityPub cannot stand up to others -- it's a fantastic, expressive, flexible, secure and extensible protocol -- but I think the framing ignores the governance issues. I do appreciate the challenges, though -- it helps make ActivityPub better.
-
Evan Prodromoureplied to Evan Prodromou last edited by [email protected]
I think ActivityPub is flexible enough that experimentation can happen in a huge number of ways. Building an extension on top of AP is very straightforward and extensions carefully designed can easily be backwards-compatible. It's simply untrue that anyone needs to start over from scratch with an incompatible base protocol in order to develop interesting new features.
-
Evan Prodromoureplied to Evan Prodromou last edited by [email protected]
Lastly, I think a lot of the discussion around ActivityPub in some communities is really negative. Instead of celebrating the immense success of the protocol, and its impressive positive characteristics, there's a lot of picking at flaws around the edges. In those communities, people find my enthusiasm about AP irritating. I understand why people might want to talk that way, but I also prefer to talk about why I love it, and how we can make a good thing better.
-
@evan this isn't a slight against activitypub but i don't think the comparison to http makes sense. partly because activitypub in a sense *is* http, at least in how it's broadly implemented. but it's just one class of http messages. i don't think it makes sense for all web traffic to be in activitypub format.
-
@trwnh I don't think you understood the example. I tried to rewrite it to make it clearer in which way I am comparing AP to other protocols.
-
@evan evan, might this be an unfair framing? the activitypub specification has a lot of positives, but the problems are a) not always at the edges, and b) mostly in how popular implementation ("the fediverse") has diverged from the spec, in some places quite significantly, to the point that anyone wanting to implement "activitypub" to the letter of the spec will not be able to talk to anyone on "the fediverse". webfinger and http sigs are one thing, but the core message semantics are another.
