I'm still marveling at the number of readers who wrote a private "thanks" to say that it took guts to write Monday's story about the new administration's disruptive week for federal cybersecurity efforts.
-
I'm still marveling at the number of readers who wrote a private "thanks" to say that it took guts to write Monday's story about the new administration's disruptive week for federal cybersecurity efforts. As if the story was somehow taking a big risk, when it was just reporting facts.
-
I'm still marveling at the number of readers who wrote a private "thanks" to say that it took guts to write Monday's story about the new administration's disruptive week for federal cybersecurity efforts. As if the story was somehow taking a big risk, when it was just reporting facts.
@briankrebs Well, you know what this administration thinks of facts…
-
I'm still marveling at the number of readers who wrote a private "thanks" to say that it took guts to write Monday's story about the new administration's disruptive week for federal cybersecurity efforts. As if the story was somehow taking a big risk, when it was just reporting facts.
@briankrebs The first half was just the facts. The part after the crypto segment was pretty much editorial. I fully agree with you, but it's not something we typically see in your posts.
-
I'm still marveling at the number of readers who wrote a private "thanks" to say that it took guts to write Monday's story about the new administration's disruptive week for federal cybersecurity efforts. As if the story was somehow taking a big risk, when it was just reporting facts.
@briankrebs it is deeply disturbing how milquetoast most people are. You are setting a good example of how not to be that.
-
I'm still marveling at the number of readers who wrote a private "thanks" to say that it took guts to write Monday's story about the new administration's disruptive week for federal cybersecurity efforts. As if the story was somehow taking a big risk, when it was just reporting facts.
@briankrebs It is, at least from me, mostly "thanks for not flipping", unlike many other journalists(?) right now who chose to fawn over fascism and its personalities rather than (at the very fucking least) question it, the weak-ass cowards.
-
I'm still marveling at the number of readers who wrote a private "thanks" to say that it took guts to write Monday's story about the new administration's disruptive week for federal cybersecurity efforts. As if the story was somehow taking a big risk, when it was just reporting facts.
@briankrebs we live in a time where most “news” either lacks a spine or is full on conspiracy nonsense. We appreciate you.
-
I'm still marveling at the number of readers who wrote a private "thanks" to say that it took guts to write Monday's story about the new administration's disruptive week for federal cybersecurity efforts. As if the story was somehow taking a big risk, when it was just reporting facts.
@briankrebs Count me as one of the people who appreciates journalists who report facts. They are increasingly difficult to find.
-
R [email protected] shared this topic
-
I'm still marveling at the number of readers who wrote a private "thanks" to say that it took guts to write Monday's story about the new administration's disruptive week for federal cybersecurity efforts. As if the story was somehow taking a big risk, when it was just reporting facts.
This post is deleted! -
I'm still marveling at the number of readers who wrote a private "thanks" to say that it took guts to write Monday's story about the new administration's disruptive week for federal cybersecurity efforts. As if the story was somehow taking a big risk, when it was just reporting facts.
@briankrebs Heheh. It’s not like you were dropping an expose of a major criminal enterprise… not that day, anyway! Or maybe even this will ultimately turn out to be such an enterprise
PS: Thanks (sans qualification)
