ICANN's proposal to go ahead with another round of gTLDs is a complete money grab, and another giant fraud, spam and scam turd for Internet users in general.
-
@briankrebs The irony of course is that the deluge of garbage gTLDs has served to vastly increase the value of good dot-com TLDs, as I and others predicted years ago.
-
@briankrebs I mean isn't ICANN as a whole a "giant fraud, spam and scam turd" anyhow?
-
@lauren @briankrebs well, does a fix really need regulators' intervention? What if enough large DNS services simply stopped resolving garbage TLD's en masse?
-
@fgcallari @briankrebs You can't do that with ICANN decisions.
-
Why? Genuinely curious - who would go after, say, Xfinity, if their DNS service (which is used by default by 99% of their customers) simply did not resolve .dingdong or .makemoneyfast ?
-
[email protected]replied to BrianKrebs last edited by [email protected]
@[email protected] I own a
.wikidomain and am considering buying a second one. I also co-run another .wiki domain that I don't own.
Was it wrong for ICANN to create the.wikiTLD? Is it bad that I'm using a.wikidomain? Would it be unethical to buy another one? Is it unethical for me to keep using the one I already have? -
[email protected]replied to Cave Cattum last edited by [email protected]
@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] Xfinity is the only ISP in my area and they (albeit briefly) blocked a domain that I own. I had to use a VPN to access my own site. The site in question is on one of those "weird" TLDs (
.wiki).
I don't believe ISPs should be allowed to block domains, let alone TLDs. -
Lauren Weinsteinreplied to [email protected] last edited by
@183231bcb @briankrebs @fgcallari In some cases, they are required by law to do so.
-
[email protected]replied to Lauren Weinstein last edited by [email protected]
@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected]
a)Xfinity was not required to block my domain, but they did anyways (albeit only for one day).
b)I'm aware that in some countries ISPs are required to block some domains. My stance is that they *shouldn't be*, and, moreover, they shouldn't be allowed to do it either.
c)Even if you think ISPs should block domains with illegal content, it seems extra ridiculous to block based on what TLD extension they use. (As Cave Cattum is suggesting). Why should an unethical or illegal website with a.comdomain be unblocked while an otherwise identical site with a.pagedomain is blocked? -
@[email protected]
A domain like minecraft.wiki is easier to read than minecraftwiki.<whatever>. I don't understand the technical details of how DNS works, but as a user, I like having different TLDs.
