Why Does Poilievre Keep Saying the Nazis Were Socialists?

[email protected]

Could be part of a new propaganda campaign: muddy the water about the left, so that any leftist law can be called evil and reverted.

“Social help? That’s socialism, and socialists are nazis. Let’s repel that law like any good common sense man would do.” ~Poil lievre (maybe)

[email protected]

Because he wants to normalise nazism? This is common modus operandi for alt-right neonazis all over the world now, they love when they can say they are not worse than others. At the same time they would happily put pure socialists in concentration camps if they had the support of the people.

[email protected]

Similar to New York cheesecake

The popular version of New York located in Cheesecake, Kentucky.

[email protected]

Not really sarcasm, Prolly is the reason he calls em socialists.

And the fact people downvoting means it was spot on

[email protected]

Could be. The CPC’s campaign strategy may judt br calling Trudeau a communist for 5 weeks or something. Or he could be setting up his forever excuse for why his government will only help corporations and the wealthy.

But it’s still weird. No one needs to give a shit about the NSDAP in Canada in 2024. It’s a really uncomfortable and lame obsession, and people don’t spend enough time pointing that out.

[email protected]

You can’t both understand and not understand. Pick a lane.

[email protected]

Because it’s a tatic of people who want to normalise fascism use to dicredit socialism.

[email protected]

Yeah Harper’s little attack dog is still on the leash he was put on.

Jerkface (any/all)

Because his ilk win through muddying the water, encouraging culture war conflicts between the citizens he means to govern, and making people feel discouraged from voting at all.

Jerkface (any/all)

I hear nazis do that, too!!

Jerkface (any/all)

He’s always trolling. It can be two things.

[email protected]

You have interacted with him personally i see.

Swordgeek

I mean, the implied question is probably “*why *is he lying about this particular item?” I personally find it helpful to hunt down his motives for any given lie, as a measure of his trajectory.

[email protected]

Just the once, which was once more than I would have liked