It occurred to me yesterday, as I waited the usual three or four minutes for Word to open my document, that the basic tasks most people use PCs for (browsing file systems, opening documents and working on them, email) have barely improved or changed si...
-
replied to Liam :fnord: on last edited by
And for a lot of these basic white collar tasks, like reading email and passing documents around, it’s now significantly more arduous to do things than it was in 2000. Using computer is experienced as an endless series of demands, to multiply authenticate, to sign up for another service, to learn yet another new means to transfer one file from one computer to another. Or cloud. God.
The computer makes us do more, which is the reverse of the promise of futurism.
-
replied to Liam :fnord: on last edited by
I was going to say, vastly more information has been digitised and is available online. But Web searching for information is significantly worse and less reliable than it has ever been. So that’s a wash I think.
-
replied to Liam :fnord: on last edited by
@liamvhogan Feeling all of this with feelings today, as both work-supported computers I use are becoming such a tangle of authentication workarounds and update clashes that I’ve started to fear closing windows.
-
replied to Liam :fnord: on last edited by
The use of computers *for leisure and socialising*, on the other hand, those are unrecognisably changed and the experience is in every way better and more powerful, by magnitudes. Modern gaming would have blown your c.2000 ears straight back. So it’s not that it can’t be done.
-
replied to Liam :fnord: on last edited by
@liamvhogan All your points are valid and yes we’re all paying the price. But it was called the information *revolution* so maybe it will go full circle back to papyrus scrolls
-
replied to Liam :fnord: on last edited byThis post did not contain any content.
-
replied to Liam :fnord: on last edited by
@liamvhogan everywhere that computers touched the army was a net negative in my time. To the extent that being out and about with your people and not being at your desk to answer emails became a point of criticism for officers.
-
replied to Liam :fnord: on last edited by
@liamvhogan can't blame the computers for that I'm afraid. We hadn't chalked a win for about 65yrs when email got introduced.
-
replied to Liam :fnord: on last edited byThis post is deleted!
-
replied to Liam :fnord: on last edited by
I have two great big screens now, which is cool, and which beat the hell out of my old 1024x768 CRT for coolness. but it’s not clear that they make my work more productive.
I have a nice clicky mechanical keyboard because I personally am richer than I was in 2000, letting me buy it myself, and because Chinese manufacturing has advanced so far. Again, not clear it makes my work more productive.
-
replied to Kate Bowles on last edited by
@liamvhogan But wait! Help is coming to us all.
-
replied to Kate Bowles on last edited by
@kate my goodness that looks shitty
-
replied to Liam :fnord: on last edited by
@liamvhogan unrelated but I just realized I subscribe to your RSS but didn’t follow you on here? I guess someone linked a blog post directly and I went that way vs a boost.
Also I’ve been reading human-computer frustration research from the early 00s and 2023 today and this all tracks hard with it.
-
replied to Ruth [☕️ 👩🏻💻📚✍🏻🧵🪡🍵] on last edited by
@platypus RSS, it had all the potential and still does
-
replied to Liam :fnord: on last edited by
@liamvhogan and even then, Apple introduced video conferencing cameras and software in 2003. Social adoption came much later
-
replied to Adam on last edited by
@Kels_316 @liamvhogan this is a digression, but were UNTAC and INTERFET considered to be successes, in the military's own terms of reference? Not that they were wars.
-
replied to Ben Harris-Roxas on last edited by
@ben_hr @liamvhogan very much so. Huge PR wins.
-
replied to Adam on last edited by
@Kels_316 @liamvhogan the only wins that exist any more I guess