hm.

[noipv6@hachyderm.io]

hm.

i haven’t quite decided weather it would be better to delete my twitter account, or let that shitposting mess be absorbed into whatever clusterfuck ai data lake might hoover it up

because like

wtf good would pro-ipv6 ranting do for most ppl

[paul_ipv6@infosec.exchange]

@noipv6

"wtf good would pro-ipv6 ranting do for most ppl"

can't speak for everyone but it's been a decent career for me so far.

[jima@mspsocial.net]

@paul_ipv6 @noipv6 Hahaha, me too, up until last week.

[kelvin0mql@mastodon.hams.social]

@jima

If ipv6 requires decent-career-level of expertise, it's not for me.

So far, nothing has come up that has made me need nor want to touch ipv6, and I'm hopeful it will remain that way until I die.

That is, if I HAVE to use ipv6, I hope it's someone else's problem, and free/transparent to me.

[kasperd@westergaard.social]

IPv6 is simpler than IPv4. If you run everything as IPv6 it's so nice to work with.

The only hard problem you will face is people who refuse do do IPv6, and suddenly you end up with a load of crap to work around lack of IPv6 and shortcomings of IPv4.

IPv6 is not to blame for those problems as they only show up where IPv6 is missing.