‘Section 31’ Director Says The Streaming Movie Is A New Flavor Of Star Trek… With A Surprise Twist
-
Value Subtractedreplied to Value Subtracted last edited by
This makes me think that the flashbacks to Georgiou's childhood seen in the trailers might be directly related to the main plot, rather than something that's just there to provide character insight.
-
[email protected]replied to Value Subtracted last edited by
the stakes are as profound as any that we’ve seen
That's not a selling point. I'm truly tired of the world ending all the time. What's wrong with smaller more personal stakes.
-
Value Subtractedreplied to [email protected] last edited by
A mild counterpoint, because I totally get where you're coming from:
Section 31 is probably the one setting that should be high stakes, all the time. Like them or not, this is kind of what they do.
-
You are both right, which is part of why this whole concept is dull. How many times can they threaten to destroy all universes ever?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Srsly. What happened to, "oh, what an interesting planet, let's explore it..."?
-
[email protected]replied to Value Subtracted last edited by
Oh god not childhood flashacks.
-
At least once more, as always.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I agree it's overused for the average episode of Trek, but if we accept that they're doing a Section 31 movie, what's the point of a low-stakes feature film (even a streaming film), especially one centered around Section 31?
-
Value Subtractedreplied to [email protected] last edited by
Honestly, if there's one character whose upbringing I'd like to see, it's this one.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
It's going to suck so hard.
-
"Smaller more personal stakes" doesn't mean something will be good, either!
-
Canonically it's 47
-
I never mentioned good or bad.
I don't really care if something is "good or bad". I only care if I like it or not. -
Ok sorry, where I'm from saying you are "truly tired" of something implies you think it's bad.
-
[email protected]replied to Value Subtracted last edited by
The tagline is “Tasked with protecting the United Federation of Planets, she also must face the sins of her past.” In Section 31? She wasn't specifically recruited because her morals are aligned to Section 31? She won't be engaging in the mission of Section 31?
-
Value Subtractedreplied to [email protected] last edited by
I'll let Luther Sloan take this one.
We search out and identify potential dangers to the Federation...we deal with them.
They certainly believe they're protecting the Federation.
-
Q The Misanthropereplied to Value Subtracted last edited by
I'm sure it'll be fun and I'm always glad to have more trek.
Two things concern me, first every person we've met previously from section 31 has been an asshole. Intentional writing to make them them an organization working against the ideals of the federation. Will that make it harder for me to like the characters or their missions? I am unsure if I want to relate better to them.
The second is that universe ending stuff has little emotional impact on me, it's unimaginable to me especially with the CGI required to visualize it. Episodes always hits me harder when it's a planet, a species, a special person or some mystery to be discovered.