Reproductive Fights

[zarkanian@sh.itjust.works]

If that were the goal, then this would be stupid. Clearly, it isn't.

[uniquitous@lemmy.one]

Funny how quickly peoples' minds change when there's the credible threat of reprisal.

[zarkanian@sh.itjust.works]

And clearly a boomer, if they remember the Summer of Love.

[zarkanian@sh.itjust.works]

Having such a vulnerable weak point be both easily accessible and unprotected is a design flaw.

[zarkanian@sh.itjust.works]

That isn't relevant, though.

[zarkanian@sh.itjust.works]

What about when they carefully aim and shoot a child?

[flax_vert@feddit.uk]

A successful abortion always has at least a 100% fatality rate.

[gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com]

Oh, so the mother's die every time?

Even under your bad definition it'd be only 50-60% (accounting for the fact that some mothers do die)

[gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com]

Again: it doesn't take balls to post at all to an anonymous forum

Keep reaching for that victim complex you so desperately crave

[dragontypewyvern@midwest.social]

Looks a little too clean cut for Gamer Brock Rittenhouse or a debate bro, seems more like a Christian frat type.

[batmaniam@lemmy.world]

I just want that snake. Is that some iconography I've missed? I have the rainbow gadsen on my range bag I want that one as well.

[childeharold@lemm.ee]

somebody thinks movies are real life. have you ever tried to kick somebody in the balls? its not actually that easy, and its not actually that vulnerable. there's a reason all the wars of human history haven't just been giant crotch-kicking competitions lmfao. If it was that simple, men would not be the warriors.

On the flip side, you could say being smaller and weaker (as all women are) is a design flaw. Oh how the tables have turned my impulsively naive friend.

[childeharold@lemm.ee]

it totally takes balls. and people like you are the reason why.

[gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com]

It doesn't take balls to comment anonymously, you're at 0 risk of anything other then getting your feelings hurt

So I mean... I guess it takes tiny, tiny, insignificant balls to ignore what people you don't care about think

[flax_vert@feddit.uk]

That'll make it 200% if they did

[chaonaut@lemmy.4d2.org]

Ah, yes, the pinnacle of masculinity: whining that people fighting for their survival and freedom didn't pay enough care to the feelings of people who didn't think their struggle was all that big of a deal in the first place.

Maybe if you weren't out to spite the people who you believe have beef with you specifically, you'd realize that the struggle against patriarchy benefits men as well, but you'd have to recognize that there are plenty of men that are specifically marginalized by those that up hold their preferred version of masculinity is the only valid way to be a man.

Or, you could skip all that and blame it all on women hating men because some depiction of a woman said something mean to a depiction of a disrespectful man and take it to have meant you specifically, I guess.

[gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com]

You can't have a higher than 100% death rate, that means more people died than were involved in what happened

By reasonable definition that's 1 death: the mother

By your own poor definition it's 2: mother and fetus

So where are we getting extra from?

[childeharold@lemm.ee]

of course it does, you risk people finding out who you are and doxxing you. that's why people are anonymous in the first place: because its inherently risky to post controversial stuff on the internet.

[drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world]

Am I blaming women? News to me.

[gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com]

Yeah, you would pretend like that's going to happen so you can feel more like a victim

Have less trash takes, it's actually really easy