Moderators banning/censoring people arent oppressors violating your rights; they are customer service representatives curating the space for their intended costomers. All this to say, I see Karen.
-
AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppetreplied to [email protected] last edited by
You're not the sharpest tack in the box. Are you?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
As a newly-appointed moderator myself, I think "customer service representatives curating a space" is going a little too far. I see myself more as a janitor taking out the trash while doing my best to leave all the art alone, whether I like it or not.
-
Those were a lot of different points. I think they’re important and I respect your view.
I‘m not sure though if I see it exactly the same:
ownership
i think this assumes a lot. You could of course start more communities and I did so. But of course your goal can be different.
authority
I agree, authority should not be important.
modding is easy
I dont think that is the case. Modding - especially good modding - is very hard, as you mentioned yourself. A mod needs enough restraint to take their ego out of the equation and needs to see when the community rules get broken and act accordingly. A lot of bad mods are too eager or too lax with bigotry.
only flagged content needs looking at
It needs to be looked at first and the rest is optional, yes. But a mod should definitely trust their gut and be an active part in the community they mod. Ideally under a different name though so to divide between mod stuff and non.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
No, they're usually just power tripping. When certain people get even a modicum of power, real or imagined, they become full-on dictators at superluminal velocities. There's some crossover with powerless people seeking revenge on the world at large (or any piece of it) for their misfortune or flights against them, real or imagined. I don't have any data on the ratios but my gut instinct wild-ass guess is that at least 25-33% fall into the tinpot tyrant category.
-
Dragon Rider (drag)replied to EleventhHour last edited by
And like many human beings, they often refuse to admit their mistakes out of pride and anger.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Thanks, that game was amazing, I loved and hated it
-
I think it's ok to be somewhat active in my community that way people at least see that there's a mod present and didn't abandon the community. I haven't had to ban anyone yet, but I did give two people a gentle warning because they had started to get off topic and argue, which is outside the scope of the group.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I imagine that phenomenon is similar to how super sheltered kids become the wildest teenagers/young adults (whichever age they are when they first get a taste of freedom.) Like how people with newfound freedom often party hard with it, people who've never been in a position of power before can easily take their new authority too far.
Totally not excusing it. It's not some inevitable "human nature" thing. There are good parents, teachers, and others in positions of authority that take their responsibility to others seriously. They're the ones that allow some modicum of function in society.
But those who seek power for its own sake are going to be ruthless about it. Then once someone has power, it's extremely difficult for them to let it go.
-
Not until we get another word for the same persona.
And for some reason we can't use "bitch" anymore.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Would you agree that banning/censoring is a form of suppression rather than oppression?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Cute game
Suddenly ended when one of my mods mislabeled 1 post despite basically all of my stats being in the green
So, you know, totally realistic and all
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
As a head CSR for my job : no mod I've ever seen is anything close to providing customer service and it's hilarious that you'd even think that in passing
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Nope, I think curat3d spaces should be allowed to exsist. Suppression would only exist if you owned a space and it was being squelched by an outside organization.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
To me it's exactly the type of services a customer service representative would provide.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
If elon musk can be a "business man" so can you.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Mods aren't taking the hippocraric oath.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Sounds like I was doing customer service before you were born.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
So, purely hypothetically, you would be fine with a curator deleting / omitting a fact because it goes against the narrative they are driving?
Interesting… personally I’d before to read a truth I disliked than to continue believing erroneous information; but that’s just me.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
If you trust this person to tell you, and everybody else here, how to speak then either your speech is worthless to you or this conversation is worthless to you.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
And sometimes it's hard to tell the difference.
What do you do when that happens? What guides do you look to?