Community

[Request] Standalone Comment System

Feature Requests

Suggested Topics

  • 讛注专砖诇讛讛

    Feature Request Replacing Like and Dislike with icons

    Feature Requests
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    406 Views
    E

    @讛注专砖诇讛 here is the screenshot for your reference:

    7ec9dacf-0883-493b-baac-119e325fd4e7-image.png

  • exodoE

    Plugin activation depending on system

    Feature Requests
    1 Votes
    3 Posts
    1380 Views
    exodoE

    @pitaj said in Plugin activation depending on system:

    hmmm... well ideally plugins and core would only load their assets when necessary. For instance, in core, we only load jQuery UI if we have some jQuery UI thing. There are many other places where we could pull more code out to be on-demand.

    you mean ideally but not on reality, right? 馃槃
    my idea was for example to enable plugins like...
    -people viewing this topic, reactions, polls, etc only on desktop

  • JoykillerJ

    [FORUM PERMISSIONS] - Request - Topics Access

    Feature Requests
    1 Votes
    6 Posts
    2201 Views
    JoykillerJ

    @julian Fixed ha didnt know about the "edit profile" with the dropdown. thx.

    Also, plugin seemed to work fine. Haven't ran into any errors yet but might customize later on to allow another specific usergroup to view not just admins.

  • PitaJP

    My list of feature requests

    Feature Requests
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    623 Views
    PitaJP

    My biggest request by far is to have some sort of centralized permissions system for which groups have access to different functionalities of plugins. This permissions system would allow both user-specific and group-specific permission configuration and would mitigate the amount of small, permission-only plugin admin pages.

    This could be done by adding the hook filter:permissions.addFields and then doing something like the database module to get permissions of a certain user or group. This, along with a simplification of settings, would be super helpful for easier creation of plugins. Plugins are going to be the best part of this platform, and if they can be created with more ease, then this platform will be embraced more. This could be done via a plugin, but it would be so much better if it were included in the core.

    Client side features requested:

    API for accessing certain server-side functionalities. Post parsing on the client side (so I don't have to include markdown.js).

    Also, I should mention that after I'm done working on the 5 or so plugins I have in queue, I'm planning on developing a very strong polyfill server-side module library for bringing all browsers up to standard based on user-agent (to minimize unnecessary code).

  • K

    Three more requests

    Feature Requests
    0 Votes
    15 Posts
    3916 Views
    K

    by wp you mean html? See I'm fine using both, but they're still a language other than english that someone must learn. Im not a fan of making anyone learn a web language just so they can format their posts. Not a fan of wysiwyg either as it's glitchy and too involved. WYSIWYG is good for learning what code does what, but eventually you need to learn the code. I learned html because of pagemill, if anyone remember that pre-dreamweaver gem. problem is it taught me to use iframes when i was 17, which wasn't great either.

Copyright 漏 2023 NodeBB | Contributors