Another high end SF restaurant is closing (Aphotic), and while I think they had a good run, I don’t think they were worth $400pp.
-
@skinnylatte it's interesting because I agree that SF's high end dining has really kind of blanded out... it's generally uninteresting and not a great experience and expensive to boot. But New York hasn't had the same problem -- like I ate at bōm back in August (high end Korean with French techniques) and it was *excellent*. Interesting and delicious. Lots of unusual fermentation which I loved. And a killer non-alcoholic pairing.
-
@skinnylatte I wish I'd succeeded at El Bulli. But now is now and that was then.
-
@samantha @gglockner yay thank you!
-
Adrianna Tanreplied to Paul Lalonde last edited by [email protected]
@Flux I got a table just in time for my college ‘grad trip’. It was fun. Not sure it would be for me now, but I also remember it being vastly cheaper than some of these mediocre restaurants here I’m talking about
-
Adrianna Tanreplied to Samantha last edited by [email protected]
@samantha I think the only places in sf that sound close to that are Ssal and Benu, and I don’t know that I would do that.
-
@skinnylatte Adria was adamant about keeping a seat to 200euro to keep the experience accessible. But with only 8000 seatings a year...
-
@Flux the surprising thing about eating in Spain (after spending all my money at El Bulli) is discovering that lunch at most nice restaurants was a flat EUR 10-20
-
@skinnylatte it may just because I grew up poor, and seem to be whatever the opposite of a supertaster is (undertaster?), but high dining has never appealed to my #actuallyautistic palette.
I feel envy at some “rich people” experiences. But… never fancy food. I want to eat what people eat, I don’t want to eat food that can only exist if we have too many rich people around