Your browser does not seem to support JavaScript. As a result, your viewing experience will be diminished, and you have been placed in read-only mode.

Please download a browser that supports JavaScript, or enable it if it's disabled (i.e. NoScript).

Version History & Roadmap

General Discussion

3

3

867

Log in to reply

P
pikshub last edited by

https://github.com/NodeBB/NodeBB/wiki/Version-History-&-Roadmap

this is forgotten
1 Reply Last reply
Reply Quote 0
charles last edited by

It would be nice to see an updated roadmap of future releases
1 Reply Last reply
Reply Quote 0
pichalite Plugin & Theme Dev last edited by

@pikshub @charles

that page in the wiki was just a list of all the included items from the issue tracker. you can get that from NodeBB's github page.

https://github.com/NodeBB/NodeBB/milestones
1 Reply Last reply
Reply Quote 0

Suggested Topics

When Installing latest NodeBB (0.8.2) it installs an incompatible version of nodebb-plugin-emailer-mandrill
General Discussion • • jongarrison

1

0
Votes

1
Posts

678
Views

I just did an install of NodeBB 0.8.2 and it installed nodebb-plugin-emailer-mandrill 0.3.1 with it which is only compatible with NodeBB 0.9.^. In addition to the declared version problem I was also getting a socket.io/helpers related error on NodeBB startup until I removed the mandrill plugin.

I worked around this problem by removing mandrill and then installing it like this:

npm install nodebb-plugin-emailer-mandrill@0.2.4

I poked around to see how nodebb installs nodebb-plugin-emailer-mandrill and it appears that this plugin is installed in a special way? It is not mentioned in the package.json requirements for nodebb.
Nodejs Version Managers
General Discussion • • gotwf

3

1
Votes

3
Posts

44
Views

@julian said in Nodejs Version Managers:

In my experience there are few reasons to use a version manager, except for development reasons (i.e. testing on older versions of Node, etc.)

In production, I am increasingly in favour of compartmentalization via containers (or currently, simply separate servers). They can each maintain their own version of Node via the OS package manager, and that's that.

Yep. I concur one hundred percent with the separate vm's for production approach. I don't think I'd utilize containers directly unless I owned the bare metal and needed to leverage that investment for additional duties. And then I'd use a better hypervisor and launch a Linux vm from there. 😜

I sometimes muck about with different nodejs based stuff that wants different versions, requirements, and such and thought it might be nice to forgo spinning up vm's for the quick exploratatories....

None of them seem to want to play nicely with FreeBSD these days though so the question seems rather moot for my use case.

Thanks for your thoughts.
S

Where can I see the PV history?
General Discussion • • sharonyue

3

0
Votes

3
Posts

951
Views

Right now, we don't support that, even though we are collecting the data. It is on the list of things to do for an upcoming version 😄
Which CMS would you choose if you wanted to create a Q&A forum?
General Discussion • cms q&ampa comparision qanda • • reaon

15

0
Votes

15
Posts

6505
Views

Someone's tried it before: http://www.nutritionask.com/

With a bunch of widgets, changes in the design. And now you can sort by upvotes too so it's probably much more possible to do a Q&A style site than it was a month ago when you first asked 🙂
Understanding the templating engine & middleware
General Discussion • middleware engine templates • • mootzville

3

0
Votes

3
Posts

1996
Views

Ya, so I was dumb...I have a local dev instance and a staging server. I was playing around with some things and forgot to switch the theme back to vanilla which explains why I was missing the navbar for the login screen...boo me.

But yes, thanks for pointing that out. The template engine and middleware are making a lot more sense now after looking through the source for the last 2 days...

I'm going to start looking to add/update the documentation here soon...some of the stuff can drive you crazy if you aren't familiar with the version changes.

Also, after reading through most of core at this point I have to say it's an impressive piece of kit. Thumbs up to the core devs. @julian @baris @psychobunny

EDIT: Also, anyone else who comes across this thread...if you really want to save yourself some time banging your head against the wall -- like I did -- take a few days to really dive into the nodebb source. It has been a good lesson in object-oriented javascript -- so many objects 🙂 -- done right. I've realized I'm approaching things more from a functional perspective, so this has been an eye opener for me.

| |

Copyright © 2021 NodeBB | Contributors

1 / 1