We're RIGHT HERE
-
[email protected]replied to Count Regal Inkwell last edited by
Xitter* (x pronounced sh style)
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Everyone assumed that they wouldn't be so stupid as to ban an app used by 170,000,000 Americans.
Now they've proven that yes they are that stupid. That corrupt.
So nah. Not going back to any US based alternative. Ever. TT to Red Book. If they ban Red Book we'll go to VK or Jaco or whatever Vietnam has going on.
Best part? It took all of about 2 hours to completely obliterate 60 years of CIA propaganda. We can see plain how much better they have it than we do. How much better life is there.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
...every president until 2016 was pro China, because the owners of the US government were pro China until China improved too much and started competing instead of just being a source of cheap labor.
And who cares if a pro China president is elected? Oh no we'll have cheap food, universal healthcare and no homelessness. How awful.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
What pro Chinese stances?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
instead push people to easy to use frontends and popular instances.
I've seriously thought about starting up a website to do exactly this. The problem is I already have a mile long project list. Oh and I suck at UX lmao, backend and hosting/infrastructure stuffs that's my jam. Putting together a nice UX with a good flow and then successfully promoting it....
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Yeah but why would we be more concerned about Chinese competition than say, the EU? Because China showed who they are in Hong Kong, and we want that to be as un-powerful as possible.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Pixelfed’s app release seems like a good start.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
We are using it mainly as a massive middle finger to the US government
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Yes. Why? Because pettiness
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
You get it. Well said.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Because China has a higher gdp than the entire EU combined?
Also yes, they didn't allow a state to be independent, just like the US would send the FBI after Texas if they declared independence, what's your point?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Honestly I didn't use tiktok that much but rednote is surprisingly different, it's less blast short form videos in users face and more a mix of Facebook with short form video focus, honestly, you should check it out, only for the reason that I think this may actually be one of the biggest unofficial cultural exchanges in history, and it's amazing to see the love going around between cultural barriers
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I agree that promoting the fediverse generally kind of doesn't make sense. People join communities, not web protocols.
I wonder if we shouldn't talk so much about "the fediverse" as we do about individual instances, because that's what people actually join. They get the rest of the fediverse for free, but their home server will always be home. Just like with reddit back in the day, how I may not have identified much with the reddit overculture, I did love some of its communities.
Like look at the difference between the slrpnk communities, and the programming.dev communities. That's something to be celebrated, like, come join this server - look at all the cool things we're doing!
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Lol, no. The US, China, and the billionaire caste, they already have all our personal data they want, because every app you run sells your personal info to thousands of data brokers who sell it to whoever wants it.
Banning TikTok is like taking off your shoes at the TSA. It's performative nonsense that inconveniences ordinary citizens and does nothing to protect anybody.
So if people want to raise a middle finger to the US government to protest its meaningless xenophobic virtue signaling, more power to them.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
That would just turn the fediverse into tiktok/facebook/whatever. The whole point is that you have to engage intentionally here, which prevents you from being served things that other people/countries/companies want you to see.
Its not hard to join here, but its not going to serve up the same experience so people leave. People also follow others, so there aren't many people on those other platforms suggesting people join them in the fediverse.
I dont understand why anyone cares if the next big social media exodus off-ramp is to the fediverse or not. A huge influx of people that dont like this style of content and how its served to them isn't going to make this better for those who do.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
You can't put videos on pixelfed, right? That unfortunately means it's not a competitive platform. Video is what people seem to want.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
This is ridiculous gatekeeping.
The point of the fediverse is to get decentralized platforms not in the hands of corporate or government interests.
If you want a cliquey, niche space, then stay on an instance focused for that.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Haha, you started to cry.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Some people's aversion of algorithms on the fediverse kind of reminds me of people's aversion of GMO food. Genetically modifying rice to contain more vitamin D is probably good; genetically modifying vegetables to contain more cyanide would probably be bad. Algorithms don't have to be built to maximize "engagement;" they can be designed to maximize other metrics, or balance multiple metrics, or be user-customizable.
IMO, Mastadon is much worse off for their refusal to implement any kind of algorithm outside their "explore" feed. When I tried using Mastodon, search was unhelpfully in chronological order, and my home feed just got overtaken by the people that post the most. In contrast, Lemmy's handling of algorithms is pretty good, imo.
As bad as search engines are now, they'd be even worse if they just gave you results in chronological order.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I feel like I already answered that in the last paragraph.
It's litterally anything that whitewashes anything the CCP does. Maybe it's justification for island building in the South China Sea, framing international right of way passages through the same body of water as border incursions, trying to reduce support for weapon sales to Taiwain, or trying to reduce allied responses to an invasion of Taiwan. It could also just be spreading general unrest.