Screenshot of BlueSky post showing the power of composable moderation.

mekka okereke :verified:

It's really easy to see when you unfairly accused a Black man of something. It's very hard to see when you make excuses for racist white women

As I've said on here many times, defending Black women or calling out racism from white women, triggers more aggressive pushback than anything I say.

More pushback than from cops and GOP politicians who follow me from their puppet accounts. More than from literal *self-described white nationalists*. Not joking.

4/N

mekka okereke :verified:

@ljrk @semitones @tillshadeisgone

So here's what Black folk have been trying to say for years, that triggers so much push back from a lot of Mastodon:

A lot of the white trans women that built community in the early Fediverse, were super racist. A lot of the white trans women still on the Fediverse today, are super racist. They are *not* more racist than the white cis men on the Fediverse. But people who are racist and trans on the Fediverse, too often get a free pass for their nonsense.

5/5

Jon

Great diagrams, thank for sharing! @[email protected]

Jon

I haven't analyzed it in any detail, and it's quite possible that the mechanism needs to be rethought completely -- @[email protected] has some great thoughts in Right of Reply. And in general, what's really needed is a detailed analysis of the abuse vectors and how to mitigate them, using social threat modeling or some other structured technique -- here's an example of social threat modeling for quote boosts.

A couple of specific potential improvements:

* The abuse cases I've heard of all come from having the reply visible to a different audience than the original post. So, having the reply to a followers-only post visible to the original poster's followers (not the replier's followers) would cut one vector. @[email protected] has a good discussion here with helpful diagrams. A picture really is worth a thousand words! I believe it already works that way on Friendica and Hubzilla, but it turns out that this is hard on Mastodon, let alone making it work across implementations.

* It's also possible that followers-only replies to public and unlisted posts might need to be prohibited. It's counter-intuitive that decreasing the audience (as opposed to adding new people) can be an abuse vector, but "private RTs" (followers-only retweets of public posts) were seen as such a problem on Twitter that they wound up getting rid of them.

@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected]

Dr. Eric J. Fielding, PhD

@mekkaokereke @ljrk @semitones @tillshadeisgone I am in all the privileged groups, but I am trying to understand what other people experience. One thing that I notice is that there are fewer Black Americans in my feed than their proportion of the population. The Fediverse is less dominated by people in the USA than the old Twitter was, with more people from Europe, and Europe has a smaller Black population, so that might be part of it.

inquiline

@EricFielding This is partly because white Europeans and white Americans hassled Black US users who popped in here in the 2022 Twitter migration. (To make matters worse, some white europeans accused Americans of "making race a problem" here, i.e. took the line that people pointing out racism were the problem, not people being racist. For some reason there was less evident racism with fewer Black users )

I'm simplifying a bit in the interest of character limit, but I saw a lot of this firsthand

inquiline

@EricFielding Anyway a lot of Black folks very understandably did not stick around, and Mastodon cemented a reputation for being racist

This is a good primer of some of the issues:
https://nexusofprivacy.net/start-making-the-fediverse-less-toxic/

Ben Rosengart

@inquiline In the past, I often felt more politically aligned with Europeans than with my fellow Americans. And on the Iraq War, climate change, urbanism, and many other things, I am. But Mastodon has made me aware that it is a more complicated picture than I had previously understood.

tom jennings

@Gargron

Quote: "Some people prefer to keep their posts to a closed group of people instead of publishing everything for the world to see."

By not addressing the abuse discussed in the thread, your reply, in juxtaposition, comes across as stating that followers-only is working as intended.

Substitute "harasser" for "some people" and it pretty much summarizes what folk are upset with in this thread.

I assume harassment is not the intent, but without an affirmative statement of some kind that's the message I'm getting from you.

I'm not angry or upset in any way. It's just code. Code has side effects, code is fungible, and can be changed. Is this issue in any queue for fixing?

@mastodonmigration @Bam @mekkaokereke

inquiline

@fivetonsflax Yeah... there's... a lot here, isn't there. For some reason in summer 2020 I got to overhear a lot of European discourse arguing about whether Black Lives Matter was a specifically American problem, or not...

IMO there are a lot of things wrong with the USA, but as a country we at least are further along* w acknowledging that both structural and interpersonal racism exist than a lot of europe is. The smallest, & I do mean smallest of victories

*active backsliding notwithstanding

Vive Levant

@stefan @Gargron @mastodonmigration @Bam @mekkaokereke is the problem the “followers only” posting or the fact that you can change the post diffusion mode afterwards ?
I mean except that the problem is the people harassing other people.

Stefan Bohacek

@Vive_Levant I don't think you can change the post visibility on Mastodon after you publish it.

So from what I understand, the problem is specifically that you can make a "followers-only" post and tag someone who is not a follower.

Vive Levant

@stefan I misinterpreted your post, my bad.

Eugen Rochko

@stefan @mastodonmigration @Bam @mekkaokereke So this was built out in accordance with early feedback around 2016/2017 and meant to address two things: One, the major downside of "protected mode" on Twitter cutting you off from being to talk to non-mutuals; and two, making sure that you could see if someone was trying to dogpile you in secret. I'm not dead set on this behaviour but it needs to be evaluated in full context. I'll bring it up to the team on Monday.

:PUA: Shlee fucked around and

@Gargron @stefan @mastodonmigration @Bam @mekkaokereke "followers only" really should mean the followers of the poster AND the followers of any tagged person.

but you know "follow sync" is one of those huge/hard unsolved problems.

Stefan Bohacek

@Vive_Levant No worries, thank you for helping me test this a bit!

Stefan Bohacek

@Gargron

"I'll bring it up to the team on Monday."

Thank you, really appreciate it!

And thank you also for providing the context behind why this behavior exists, very interesting. Really shows how hard it can be to get this right.

@mastodonmigration @Bam @mekkaokereke

Stefan Bohacek

This post is deleted!

Vive Levant

@stefan pleasure. Thanks for enlightening me about this harassment technique.

Stefan Bohacek

@Vive_Levant My pleasure likewise!

Coincidentally, Eugen, the creator of Mastodon, just replied with some background for why this behavior exists.

https://mastodon.social/@Gargron/113575766625455730

Interesting stuff.