The existence of git push implies the existence of git pop.

[ryanc@infosec.exchange]

The existence of git push implies the existence of git pop.

[arrjay@tacobelllabs.net]

@ryanc I was thinking `git shove' ..

[ryanc@infosec.exchange]

@arrjay i have a new force push alias now

[cr0w@infosec.exchange]

@ryanc git ret

[ryanc@infosec.exchange]

@cR0w i've just aliased nop = "!f(){ :;};f"

[kalvaro@mastodon.social]

@ryanc I can never tell which git commands are real and which are pranks.

[dlgeek@infosec.exchange]

@ryanc git stash pop is a thing at least ..

[jeffgrigg@mastodon.social]

@dlgeek @ryanc

Yes.
And given that the opposite of "git push" is "get fetch", shouldn't the first be called "get throw"?

[ryanc@infosec.exchange]

@JeffGrigg @dlgeek git yeet when?

[simonbp@social.linux.pizza]

@ryanc Also git snap and git crackle

[ryanc@infosec.exchange]

@simonbp velocity acceleration jerk snap crackle pop

[ryanc@infosec.exchange]

@kAlvaro with aliases, they can all be real