Refugee advocates want Canada to make exemption for U.S. transgender asylum claims
-
This post did not contain any content.
-
[email protected]replied to Sunshine (she/her) last edited by
Not if they can't provide evidence of physical violence. Negative comments and mockery does not rise to the level of orders for being hunted for execution like some opposing political people or religious people had their families killed for not bowing to government system and surviving members had to flee country before they end up dead like their family.
-
[email protected]replied to Sunshine (she/her) last edited by
Unfortunately, Pierre Poilievre just said in an interview that he doesn't see anything wrong with Trump's executive order because there are only two genders.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Gauri Sreenivasan, co-executive director of the Canadian Council for Refugees, said the orders will harm transgender people who are seeking to make an asylum claim in the United States.
Under Trump's policies for example, a transgender woman could be placed in a detention facility with male detainees.
That obviously puts trans asylum seekers at risk of violence.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
If they break the law. So Transgender criminals. We don't see yet people being put in jail for being transgender. If that is happening then yes we can revisit the question but it is not happening.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
So harming criminals is okay, got it. Shall we reinstate the age-old tradition of cutting off thieves' hands? And you haven't even addressed the difference between being charged with a crime and being convicted, both of which can land you in jail.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Yeah and women have to be on their death bed to justify an abortion, and lots of people got Covid anyway so why bother with masks?
Oh and Musk didn’t do a Nazi salute it was a Roman salute.
Did I miss anything?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Jail vs Prison.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
That's correct. You were the one talking about criminals in jail, which would be reserved for minor crimes/sentences or people awaiting trial (not that that precludes violence from other inmates). So which are you talking about?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
(That was my first post on the thread. I was just making sure there was the clarification of the two locations and the innocent people would be in jail, where prison are for those convicted.)
-
Excellent idea
-
PP doesn't get to decide that, does he?
-