It is a pity that #Peertube has never been well integrated with #Microblogging.
-
smallcircles (Humanity Now 🕊)replied to [email protected] last edited by
-
@thisismissem Ah, got it.
So it is much processing work currently but it's okay for the search because there the URLs are mostly to objects. Not really doable for all links though....but wait. Doesn't Masto fetch the linked HTML anyways for the link preview? Oo
-
@jonny @thisismissem @smallcircles @peertube
Part of the issue is that the data model and frontend are too tightly coupled. “Microblogging” or “video publishing” or “photo publishing” should be entirely a front-end issue. The data itself *could* in principle be shared between all of them.
The other pain point (“wrong instance”) comes from the Fediverse, and could be solved with OpenWebAuth, which is one of the FEPs proposed as part of the nomadic identity support
https://wedistribute.org/2024/03/activitypub-nomadic-identity/ -
@Glatorius yeah, for search we can assume you're looking for AP things, so like doing a webfinger request or fetching as the AS2 content-type isn't so bad; but obviously we can't do that with any arbitrary link
We do fetch the full HTML, but the issue was a lack of standard link/meta tags to say "yo, this is an AP object!", that's what the taskforce is defining
-
@oblomov @jonny @smallcircles @peertube yeah, there's a few things that make this better. I've a laundry list of OAuth changes I need to make in Mastodon before we can really consider those things though.
e.g., OAuth Client ID Metadata Documents to support IndieAuth and FedCM
-
@thisismissem hell ya
-
TheFederatedPipereplied to [email protected] last edited by
I've thought about this. All fediverse backends should implement all kinds of objects. I think mbin is a lot better than others because of this.
-
@smallcircles @peertube Since this answer was boosted, here is an explanation of the current state and why this doesn't really work with every link for now:
https://hachyderm.io/@thisismissem/113486614405418531 -
smallcircles (Humanity Now 🕊)replied to jonny (good kind) last edited by
OT: I might take this opportunity to point to something tangential in case you find that interesting, namely that @helge has prepared a forum topic for thinking about next-gen social web protocol visions, etc.
Wiki: Vision for a Fedi Specification
This topic is for people who believe, that we need a better specification underlying the Fediverse. In order to develop such a thing, one needs a group of people that work towards a common goal. The goal of this wiki is…
Discuss Social Coding (discuss.coding.social)
-
@Glatorius @smallcircles @peertube It's possible, yes. I have definitely read a discussion about this somewhere on the Mastodon GitHub. From memory, you'd either have to do that check when someone first clicks on a link, which works-ish but would add potentially multiple seconds of delay in corner cases, or you check for every link in any incoming post, which would hugely increase the Mastodon DDoS effect.
-
@TheFederatedPipe @smallcircles Agreed, for full fediverse compliance, *something* should be shown for all types of object, and all actor types too!
Ignoring them completely is not helpful, it would be much better even to just display canonical link if nothing else is available.
I say this as dev of @manyfold; I'd like to be able to provide custom types that have meaningful semantics, but instead I need to use the restricted set of types that Mastodon will react to.
-
@TheFederatedPipe @smallcircles years ago we had https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OEmbed. Feels like we ought to be able to leverage something like that.
-
Exactly, the server shouldn't ignore it, the user via the client should do it if they wanted to.
I don't like the fact that @Mastodon has basically stalled the development of the fediverse, people here are way to afraid of breaking stuff. Don't get me wrong, backward compatibility is cool, but sometimes you gotta do it for the benefit of the whole net.
I've read about some cool FEPs that are basically ignored out of the fear of incompatibility with Mastodon or older versions despite de fact they solve a huge problem.
-
silverpillreplied to smallcircles (Humanity Now 🕊) last edited by
@smallcircles @peertube Other micro-blogging services can receive videos, photos and events, and display them as posts. Only Mastodon can't do that.
-
@thisismissem @smallcircles @peertube
We don't need to custom build a bunch of modal windows in every fedi app. There are platform provided solutions to this problem.At the same time, mastodon lacks quote posts, or any other way to attach AP objects to a post. Which would solve this problem and more.
-
@jenniferplusplus @smallcircles @peertube platform provided solutions? So maybe at a stretch FedCM?
-
@thisismissem @smallcircles @peertube
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Navigator/registerProtocolHandler
And similar/compatible capabilities in every operating system -
@jenniferplusplus @smallcircles @peertube protocol handlers aren't great because it limits you to one account, this has been discussed at length
-
Jenniferplusplusreplied to Emelia 👸🏻 last edited by [email protected]
@thisismissem @smallcircles @peertube
No more so than the redirect modal does. If you land on your mastodon instance and can't easily switch to your other account on that instance, that seems like a mastodon problem, not a protocol handler problem. And the protocol handler doesn't require developers to adopt mastodons route schemes in order to be intelligible to the redirect modal. -
@jenniferplusplus @smallcircles @peertube right but at least I can have accounts on different servers.
