Serious question here: *How could* it manage to be better than humans at summarizing, given how it works? It’s just so frustrating that this was ever in question (is a computer better at summarizing?)https://toot.cafe/@baldur/113075010415209751
-
Serious question here: *How could* it manage to be better than humans at summarizing, given how it works? It’s just so frustrating that this was ever in question (is a computer better at summarizing?)
https://toot.cafe/@baldur/113075010415209751 -
@[email protected] This is one of the things that has pissed me off so badly the entire time: these were always lies that required proof ("AI is better at task X") by the people selling it, but it was always going to be up to people who make no money off of it to disprove it despite the burden of proof not even being on their shoulders.
Corporate bodies making money wasting everyone's time and getting contracts for useless services; meanwhile, everyone pays both for the "service" AND for the studies to prove how useless they are. What a scam.