The story is from May 2. This is as much a reflection of the users as it is of #Meta's modus operandi.
-
The story is from May 2. This is as much a reflection of the users as it is of #Meta's modus operandi.
"The longer a Twitter veteran spends on Threads, the more they notice what might be described as big Meta energy β and that's not a good thing." #Threads
"Too many Threads users are coming direct from Instagram and unwittingly relying on the Meta algorithm's pick of the Threads it wants them to read β regardless of whether they actually follow the accounts posting them" https://mashable.com/article/meta-threads-beat-twitter-x @Mashable @BeAware
-
-
@AAKL @Mashable well yeah, that's what I mean. I am unseen because these dumb accounts are engagement baiting and talking AT people instead of TO people and that's because the algorithm favors that type of stuff. I am unseen, in favor of these weird, dumb accounts because of the "for you" feed.βοΈ
-
-
-
-
-
@BeAware @WorMP3 @Mashable The algorithm os based on user behavior: https://blog.hootsuite.com/threads-algorithm/
-
@ππππΌπΏπΉ:~$ :t_blink:replied to @ππππΌπΏπΉ:~$ :t_blink: last edited by
@AAKL @BeAware @Mashable To expand a little, if I were a new #Threads I wouldnβt even think about looking at the βfor youβ for the first 1 month of constant use. I do the same with streaming services, why? The algorithm doesnβt βknow meβ so its suggestions are trash. The fact that people act like this is new boggles my mind, itβs like theyβve never used any other service with an algorithm. :blobshrug:
-
-
-
-
-
-
-