The thing I love about this post and all its replies, is the stark difference in replies in answer to Brent's very reasonable question.
-
Anders NorΓ©nreplied to mekka okereke :verified: last edited by
@mekkaokereke There is also all these conservative people who think that the present state of Mastodon is a feature and that any changes will lead to deterioration (a.k.a. more users).
-
AJ Sadauskasreplied to mekka okereke :verified: last edited by
@mekkaokereke Sadly, I get the impression that the window of opportunity for Mastodon to be the great Twitter replacement might have closed.
It's just so quiet in here right now, especially compared with BlueSky.
That might change over time?
I think what a lot of people wanted was just a better moderated Twitter. And that's something Mastodon ultimately failed to deliver, particularly with the default apps.
I think perhaps it's time to focus on Mastodon better at being its own thing. A place for slower, more thoughtful, longer form conversations.
And to keep chipping away at the moderation and other issues that have held it back.
I certainly think there's merit in better federation between the Fedi and BlueSky.
But these are just a few disjointed thoughts...
-
@ajsadauskas @mekkaokereke I have tried to get lefty media guys and political parties interested in Mastodon -- and they seem to not get it. Wondering what else to do.
-
@violanders @mekkaokereke yeah, that's one that's pervasive and shouldn't be the norm β if you want small you probably want to be on an island network, not a public one
-
@thisismissem @mekkaokereke I understand that Mastodon, and Fedi in general, has issues when it comes to moderation but "security by obscurity" is, as usual, not the correct answer.
-
@mistergibson @mekkaokereke There was a whole wave of Australian journalists and prominent #auspol Twitter users who moved to Mastodon when Elon first bought the bird app.
Some moved back to X, others moved on to Threads and BlueSky.
Many who tried Masto for a time ended up on BlueSky.
I think there's a few reasons why that happened.
The onboarding journey and the default app, especially two years ago but still today, just weren't great.
There have also been issues with moderation and harassment.
There's issues, like quotes, that were supported by other Fedi apps but not Mastodon.
With credit to the Mastodon developers, some of those issues have been fixed, just nig nearly fast enough.
I definitely think there's value in Mastodon and the Fediverse more broadly.
But I'm now a lot less sure that role will be "the new Twitter".
-
Although, when people start seeing budgets of $30+ million, they often get more interested in the money than the principles.
I find it astonishing, as somebody who can barely use 5% of the functions on my doohickey gadgets, how Mastodon is held together by goodwill and string. The trade off from that is that we must accept what people can afford to do for us with their time and efforts.
-
Laurens Hofreplied to mekka okereke :verified: last edited by
@mekkaokereke I've seen roughly a different gazillion tech explanations of why people go to Bluesky, and zero explanations that account for the fact that on Bluesky you have AOC talking about Baja Blast Chicken
-
@violanders @mekkaokereke correct, hence those wanting a small network probably want to be on an island network instead of a public free for all.
-
mekka okereke :verified:replied to Bad Gardener last edited by
Nope.
I refuse to accept that.
We will find a way to pay for Mastodon development. We should also be able to prioritize safety and user experience features.
An open source app I highlight is Inkscape. Yes, it's an open source app. But they *obsess* about user experience. Read the release notes for Inkscape 1.3. seriously. Read it.
Fight giants. Even BlueSky is punching up at Twitter. $30MM vs $50B+. More than 2 orders of magnitude.
-
Emelia πΈπ»replied to mekka okereke :verified: last edited by
@mekkaokereke @Badgardener we should refuse to accept that.
But the reality right now is projects are underfunded. I've heard of at least a few that may need to shutdown within the next 6-12 months unless they can attract funding.
For 5 engineers in Europe, you're looking at a burn rate of at least β¬30,000 a month (that's β¬60-72k salaries), then there's operating expenses, taxes, server/infrastructure costs on top.
-
Bad Gardenerreplied to mekka okereke :verified: last edited by
Refuse to accept what? That we should be grateful to those currently keeping Mastodon afloat?
If you have a way to prioritise and shortcut improvements to safety and onboarding, that's wonderful. Truly. Get going, and I'm in awe of your talents.
But for the vast majority of users, there are two gripes - what Mastodon *isn't* providing, and the ridiculous amount of gatekeeping within the system. Both are off-putting. For the former, most of us can't fix that.
-
I'm currently targeting β¬68k a year and I'm at β¬51k now, with β¬40k coming from just one place.
I'm working on moderation tools in Mastodon, FIRES, leading the ActivityPub Trust & Safety Taskforce, and contributing to a handful of other projects, and I'm *barely* scraping by.
I'm even trying to sell more services. I also help the Hachyderm team with bugs & infrastructure.
-
Exactly, and people like me need to put up, or shut up. What you do is great, and if people want *this* model to continue, they need to accept that you're doing all you can.
Or, we can start thinking about funding.
-
@Badgardener @mekkaokereke keeping a boat millimetres from sinking isn't a fantastic outcome. It's a dire situation, obviously the boat shouldn't be sinking in the first place.
-
@Badgardener @mekkaokereke the latter would be *really* good. I can only do all that I do as long as I have enough money to stay afloat financially & pay my bills and put food on my table.
-
So that's your next target: how to get your work to fruition. It's never not going to be about money, so either it's a slow process with an organic, ethical income - or rapid with money from potentially problematic sources.
I think we may be talking at cross-purposes: I'm not advocating for protection and safeguarding to take back seats. I've done plenty of those things. I'm saying that we need to be grateful for what you can currently do, or else put up the money.
-
@Badgardener @mekkaokereke have a look at the latest trunks and tidbits: https://blog.joinmastodon.org/2024/11/trunk-tidbits-october-2024/ (2 PRs are mine, and I was one of two people who reviewed the FASP project outside of Mastodon and helped guide them away from OAuth for that)
Have a look at the titles of my open PRs: https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon/pulls/ThisIsMissEm
I'm doing the work, yet only 54 people are funding my work, and I talk about my work & market myself A LOT.
-
mekka okereke :verified:replied to Bad Gardener last edited by
Fair question!
So I'll answer it. I refuse to accept that people who work on Fediverse trust & safety full time should have to be inches from financial disaster all the time. As an industry we have to find other ways to pay for stuff. Some Fedi people are so anti-VC and anti-capitalist, that they become anti-commerce, and anti-paying people for their labor.
Paying people for their labor is not bad. It's good actually.
-
mekka okereke :verified:replied to mekka okereke :verified: last edited by
So I refuse to accept substandard Trust and Safety and on boarding features.
Because we have the people that know how to build great features.