The thing I love about this post and all its replies, is the stark difference in replies in answer to Brent's very reasonable question.
-
@Eris @mekkaokereke (For the changes, I mean something like: a user can ask to be added to a public list in a similar way to how they can ask to follow someone with a locked profile, and similar they could ask to be removed from a list; some of these action could be automatic, but with care: for example, you can remove yourself from a starter list, but not from a public block list)
-
@oblomov yeah that’s basically all bluesky’s lists are, from what i can tell. i think for public shareable lists, it needs to be opt-in not opt-out. Too easy to be used for harassment otherwise.
block lists work similarly. as do labels. i believe people can request to be taken off, but that’s up to whoever manages the list.
moderation services would be quite a bit more complicated, idk about that. one instinctual thought i had was to be able to follow another server’s moderation decisions on an account level, but thinking about it for an extra few seconds, that’d get real hairy real quick. but maybe we could take some ideas there? i don’t know.
-
@ckent @larsivi @mekkaokereke Mastodon in its entirety.
It's heavily populated by Europeans and North Americans, and _white_ Europeans and North Americans at that. It's hard to find a lot of people outside of that bubble.
-
Anders Norénreplied to mekka okereke :verified: last edited by
@mekkaokereke There is also all these conservative people who think that the present state of Mastodon is a feature and that any changes will lead to deterioration (a.k.a. more users).
-
AJ Sadauskasreplied to mekka okereke :verified: last edited by
@mekkaokereke Sadly, I get the impression that the window of opportunity for Mastodon to be the great Twitter replacement might have closed.
It's just so quiet in here right now, especially compared with BlueSky.
That might change over time?
I think what a lot of people wanted was just a better moderated Twitter. And that's something Mastodon ultimately failed to deliver, particularly with the default apps.
I think perhaps it's time to focus on Mastodon better at being its own thing. A place for slower, more thoughtful, longer form conversations.
And to keep chipping away at the moderation and other issues that have held it back.
I certainly think there's merit in better federation between the Fedi and BlueSky.
But these are just a few disjointed thoughts...
-
@ajsadauskas @mekkaokereke I have tried to get lefty media guys and political parties interested in Mastodon -- and they seem to not get it. Wondering what else to do.
-
@violanders @mekkaokereke yeah, that's one that's pervasive and shouldn't be the norm — if you want small you probably want to be on an island network, not a public one
-
@thisismissem @mekkaokereke I understand that Mastodon, and Fedi in general, has issues when it comes to moderation but "security by obscurity" is, as usual, not the correct answer.
-
@mistergibson @mekkaokereke There was a whole wave of Australian journalists and prominent #auspol Twitter users who moved to Mastodon when Elon first bought the bird app.
Some moved back to X, others moved on to Threads and BlueSky.
Many who tried Masto for a time ended up on BlueSky.
I think there's a few reasons why that happened.
The onboarding journey and the default app, especially two years ago but still today, just weren't great.
There have also been issues with moderation and harassment.
There's issues, like quotes, that were supported by other Fedi apps but not Mastodon.
With credit to the Mastodon developers, some of those issues have been fixed, just nig nearly fast enough.
I definitely think there's value in Mastodon and the Fediverse more broadly.
But I'm now a lot less sure that role will be "the new Twitter".
-
Although, when people start seeing budgets of $30+ million, they often get more interested in the money than the principles.
I find it astonishing, as somebody who can barely use 5% of the functions on my doohickey gadgets, how Mastodon is held together by goodwill and string. The trade off from that is that we must accept what people can afford to do for us with their time and efforts.
-
Laurens Hofreplied to mekka okereke :verified: last edited by
@mekkaokereke I've seen roughly a different gazillion tech explanations of why people go to Bluesky, and zero explanations that account for the fact that on Bluesky you have AOC talking about Baja Blast Chicken
-
@violanders @mekkaokereke correct, hence those wanting a small network probably want to be on an island network instead of a public free for all.
-
mekka okereke :verified:replied to Bad Gardener last edited by
Nope.
I refuse to accept that.
We will find a way to pay for Mastodon development. We should also be able to prioritize safety and user experience features.
An open source app I highlight is Inkscape. Yes, it's an open source app. But they *obsess* about user experience. Read the release notes for Inkscape 1.3. seriously. Read it.
Fight giants. Even BlueSky is punching up at Twitter. $30MM vs $50B+. More than 2 orders of magnitude.
-
Emelia 👸🏻replied to mekka okereke :verified: last edited by
@mekkaokereke @Badgardener we should refuse to accept that.
But the reality right now is projects are underfunded. I've heard of at least a few that may need to shutdown within the next 6-12 months unless they can attract funding.
For 5 engineers in Europe, you're looking at a burn rate of at least €30,000 a month (that's €60-72k salaries), then there's operating expenses, taxes, server/infrastructure costs on top.
-
Bad Gardenerreplied to mekka okereke :verified: last edited by
Refuse to accept what? That we should be grateful to those currently keeping Mastodon afloat?
If you have a way to prioritise and shortcut improvements to safety and onboarding, that's wonderful. Truly. Get going, and I'm in awe of your talents.
But for the vast majority of users, there are two gripes - what Mastodon *isn't* providing, and the ridiculous amount of gatekeeping within the system. Both are off-putting. For the former, most of us can't fix that.
-
I'm currently targeting €68k a year and I'm at €51k now, with €40k coming from just one place.
I'm working on moderation tools in Mastodon, FIRES, leading the ActivityPub Trust & Safety Taskforce, and contributing to a handful of other projects, and I'm *barely* scraping by.
I'm even trying to sell more services. I also help the Hachyderm team with bugs & infrastructure.
-
Exactly, and people like me need to put up, or shut up. What you do is great, and if people want *this* model to continue, they need to accept that you're doing all you can.
Or, we can start thinking about funding.
-
@Badgardener @mekkaokereke keeping a boat millimetres from sinking isn't a fantastic outcome. It's a dire situation, obviously the boat shouldn't be sinking in the first place.
-
@Badgardener @mekkaokereke the latter would be *really* good. I can only do all that I do as long as I have enough money to stay afloat financially & pay my bills and put food on my table.
-
So that's your next target: how to get your work to fruition. It's never not going to be about money, so either it's a slow process with an organic, ethical income - or rapid with money from potentially problematic sources.
I think we may be talking at cross-purposes: I'm not advocating for protection and safeguarding to take back seats. I've done plenty of those things. I'm saying that we need to be grateful for what you can currently do, or else put up the money.