Check all Criminals to Continue
-
Somehow you are missing the violence that Thompson inflicted on all of his thousands of victims? Maybe you are ok with that because your moral compass is dictated by the state? Or is it ok because they are peasants? Or maybe you are ok with sick people needlessly suffering so this shit eater can have more boat money?
-
Never said it was ok for the health insurance companies to do what they are doing, they are parasites
Once again you are missing the point that shooting a guy in the street simply exacerbates the problem and doesn't solve it
You seriously think Luigi's actions helped people? You think health insurance companies will forget their prime directive because 1 CEO died? In fact this will just make them even MORE greedy because they have the police on their side now and they can be terrible without consequence
If I shoot the Nestlé CEO does that return all the water they stole from Africa? Of course not, and if that happened you people would probably be celebrating that as well
Luigi's actions have been a net negative to society, and will jusy create more divide between people. What do you think the world would be like if everyone had Luigi's mindset of "I'm going to kill this person because I don't like them". We would be in complete chaos and a warlord would break into your house and either turn you into a slave or kill you in 1 day
I'm not ok with the health insurance industry, but I'm also not OK with shooting people in the street instead of even trying to fix the issue diplomatically. Seems lile everyone has lost their collective minds over this and just default to "Health care bad so we can kill CEOs!!!". Without ever questioning the overreaching consequences.
The amount of Luigi simping on Lemmy is disgusting and I haven't said anything until now because I knew this would be the exact response. Adults having the functional capacity of children and refusing to see that this type of rhetoric is going to cause so much violence. Disagree if you want, I'll happily argue with you because I like arguments, but just know that this type of language is, and has been, responsible for so much suffering and hatred in the world.
The fact that having basic fucking morals is said to be "dictated by the state" is completely mentally inept and it's wild how people actually think this is GOOD. Shame on you all.
-
You don't mourn when the dragon devouring the town is slain,, you celebrate.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Not even by the definition. He's accused of murder. He hasn't been proven guilty.
-
I like how you completely ignored the reason why all this has happened so you can nitpock on an argument where you barely have a leg to stand on.
-
🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️replied to [email protected] last edited by
If the cop is partially in the same square as Luigi, do I check it?
-
I literally talked about health insurance in the first sentence of the root comment. Can you read?
-
What if we slayed it by bombing the entire town, do we still celebrate?
5/10 gotcha try again tomorrow
-
Thank you for being the only rational person in this thread
-
so funny seeing lemmy bounce around "he killed him so good" and "he didnt kill him it hasnt been proven in a court of law!"
It's either one or the other dood
-
Read my big comment later down
-
"yeah bro he's a murderer, but he killed someone bad so he ISN'T a murderer!"
No comment
-
[email protected]replied to 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️ last edited by
I guess we'll see what our AI overlords decide
-
Show me the bombed town. What a strange comment, as if we all didn't clearly see what happened: one executive died.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Remember all these laws that invaded privacy under "fighting terrorism"? Now you are the terrorists.
-
Hmm, I think your position is well-founded. I agree - shooting people usually created division and doesn't solve the underlying problem. However, that doesn't mean that it has to be like that in every case.
I personally propose to wait a few years before judging. It is very against the spirit of the Internet, but you raise a valid point - there is very good ground to suspect it will have negative consequences.
-
You know how a trial works, right?
He still has to stand trial and be convicted by a trial of his peers.
Even if the evidence is overwhelming, the jury still has to issue a verdict.
It would hardly be the first time there’s a hung jury or even a nullified jury.
You need to learn how the justice system actually works, instead of watching law and order.
-
Whether you think the person he killed deserved it or not is irrelevant, giving a free pass because of that sets an extremely dangerous precedent
It's just patently absurd. It's an angry mob. They probably didn't even know the victim. They could turn on you, me, or each other.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Should have been extra checks over Adam's box
