Should the Government of Canada continue to use the bird site to share important official information?
-
Senator Paula Simonsreplied to Geoff Wozniak last edited by
@GeoffWozniak Thank you. We all got ourselves in trouble by naively treating Twitter and Facebook like public utilities. A big mistake.
-
@sleepy62 Agreed.
-
Senator Paula Simonsreplied to Senator Paula Simons last edited by
-
Action Jay 🐾 :CApride:replied to Senator Paula Simons last edited by
@Paulatics awesome work. I'd love to see a collection of Canadian run federated sites providing local/niche coverage with more resistance to outside tampering like we've been seeing
-
-
Sweet Home Alaberta 🇨🇦 🇺🇦 🏳️🌈 🏳️⚧️replied to Senator Paula Simons last edited by
@Paulatics
Thank you for that, please do follow up. I'd also like the Senate to consider hosting a Mastodon instance (perhaps with the help of a special webmeister we both appreciate) to demonstrate to the government how it too can reach Canadians and still be under full control of the govt instead vany corporate control. The EU has realized this... -
@Paulatics thank you for raising this issue Senator.
-
@Paulatics Thank you Senator, and please draw attention to our shared digital information spaces—critical infrastructure—whenever you can.
Canadians need protection from bad actors, foreign and domestic, who'd love for us to check out or turn against each other.
...and it seems like most of us aren't even aware that there is a problem.
-
@dcdeejay I fear that is all too true.
-
Hamish Buchananreplied to Senator Paula Simons last edited by
Good questions.
Certainly X should be excluded, but it is also time to ask if governments at all levels should be relying on politically biased media, such as X, FB/IG, or the commercial newspapers/networks to get messages out. People shouldn't have to use those platforms in order to stay informed.
On the other hand, how can governments get essential information out to publics which increasingly rely exclusively on social media for their news?
