I believe AI is going to kill us all if it is not eradicated and I have to spend a lot of time explaining that no, I don't mean it's going to become superintelligent https://fediscience.org/@ct_bergstrom/113028760435643985
-
@mcc @puppygirlhornypost2 @tehstu @not2b @glyph @ireneista you can only move an EU citizens’ personal data to a third country with an adequacy decision
The European Commission has so far recognised Andorra, Argentina, Canada (commercial organisations), Faroe Islands, Guernsey, Israel, Isle of Man, Japan, Jersey, New Zealand, Republic of Korea, Switzerland , the United Kingdom under the GDPR and the LED, the United States (commercial organisations participating in the EU-US Data Privacy Framework) and Uruguay as providing adequate protection.
Note that every few years the ECJ overturns the recognition of the US and then the parliament & US government ink a very slightly tweaked but obviously noncompliant deal and the process repeats because sometimes people make a new law and then decide they don’t actually like the consequences of it :drgn_scream_angry:
-
@erincandescent @tehstu @glyph @mcc @not2b @puppygirlhornypost2 yeah, we have no specific knowledge of any particular violations but in our privacy work we see things that make it very obvious that violation is constant and ongoing
-
@erincandescent @tehstu @glyph @mcc @not2b @puppygirlhornypost2 but yes, as you say, these specific provisions and everybody's blatant non-compliance have been at the center of various treaty frameworks being invalidated
and then the politicians have to get involved and pinky swear not to do it again, which nobody actually believes
-
@ireneista @tehstu @glyph @mcc @not2b @puppygirlhornypost2 The problem is not violation of the treaty frameworks; it’s that the US will not restrict the surveilence activities of the NSA.
The treaties fundamentally do not comply with the requirements set forth in the GDPR and are hence invalid.
-
@erincandescent @tehstu @glyph @mcc @not2b @puppygirlhornypost2 yeah - they don't comply because the US hasn't made laws that would implement them, right? we're not lawyers, but that's been our understanding
-
@ireneista @tehstu @glyph @mcc @not2b @puppygirlhornypost2 If the treaty bound the US wrt mass surveilence and so on, it would be fine; intergovernmental treaties generally hold power at least as strong as national law.
But it doesn’t, so there is no adequacy.