POV: It's January 19th
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Brother, that is still the laws on the books. Age does not matter. Do you really not understand that? Do you think laws expire? Did you choose to not understand? What's your deal? You live inside your own nightmare.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Oh geez, well my condolences.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Negligence (and even cruelty) is different from literal torture and (allegedly) extermination of an ethnic/religious group.
Also, gitmo holds hundreds of people, not hundreds of thousands.
-
Ah yes, freedoommm!!
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Another platform will pop up over the next week if TikTok is banned.
Or an existing social media will try to take its place; Meta and Google have sites which imitate TikTok's UI (at least, in part).
I don't think it's the only reason necessarily (and I'm inclined to agree your reasons are, at least, part of it) but I think the chance for U. S. companies to cannibalize TikTok's market demographics is, also, a happy little coincidence of the consequences.
-
I'm wrong or the whole thing of the USA is the "freedooom"?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I might be killed, but seeing the comments i feel like lemmy is getting too into the zone of umm like judging the action based on the person instead of judging the action/statement itself, yeah the US gov is a piece of shit, and also they probably don't have the peoples best interest in mind, but the act of banning tiktok, according to me, is a right move, i can see nd myself have felt the humongous mental impact it has on teens (like me) basically killing their attention span, and making them feel like they need to pick up their phone, heck kids cant read 10pages from their physics book, infact reading a page only thoroughly is a tough task for most of them, and i m not talking abt a few select cases, i can see this in 95% of kids (this is anecdotal tho), ever since i stopped using reels/tiktoks/shorts, i can feel my mind improving
Also the whole slew of misinformation and propaganda tiktok is, is another issue
Again I agree with ppl that the US doesn’t hv the ppls best interest, but i do feel this might help atleast some ppl break their addiction, so many I know are aware they r addicted but can’t stop, banning the app altogether might help
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
The thing with TikTok is almost all americans on it have gravitated away from other platforms because it has more to offer. I don't think there's a large demographic on TikTok who don't precisely understand why they use TikTok over other platforms. I also believe this is why they want to force TikTok to sell, they want to have it exist as a platform but with new management.
If TikTok doesn't sell and it does get banned, I almost guarantee the demographic will quickly find themselves on another, likely Chinese owned, platform. This will still be a win for Congress as they'll have fractured TikTok and weakened the demographic as a whole.
Time will tell.
-
I have a completely de-googled phone. No meta apps. No google apps. But I do have RedNote. Long live the CCP!
-
Ah, I also have the Huawei App Store and Huawei services for banking apps.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
so use a VPN?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Companies would simply be punished by the law
can you show me any recent examples of this happening with any effectiveness?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
It is and there is tons of proof.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
So are the xinny apps
Two things can be bad at once you dipshit
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Yup, much better to let a foreign evil government have your data than the local evil government that actually has control where you live.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Fair point that it hasn't been rescinded, but I'm struggling to find any convictions based on this law or citations of this law ever being used in court, so it really does not seem relevant nowadays. If anyone can dig up any and reference them here, I'll gladly edit this comment to reflect that information.
There are laws from 1700s that haven't been rescinded but also bear no relevance to the modern day. California just changed old legal language stating that marriage was defined as being between a man and woman, but gay marriage has been legal for a long time now.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Which is why you linked so much of this proof, eh?
To date, there is no public evidence that Beijing has actually harvested TikTok’s commercial data for intelligence or other purposes.
TikTok collects a lot of data. But that’s not the main reason officials say it’s a security risk | CNN Business
After TikTok CEO Shou Chew testified for more than five hours on Thursday before a Congressional committee, one thing was clear: US lawmakers remain convinced that TikTok is an urgent threat to national security.
CNN (www.cnn.com)
-
Where? Just curious.
-
Google doesn't push right wing propaganda to my phone. Do they only do that to US citizens?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Technical possibilities to circumvent a law are not part of my argument here.