Guns

Pavel Chichikov

you probably didn't even refute my points anyways. just not worth it.

[email protected]

You literally said it yourself bud, you don't believe in using flashlights so you don't shoot someone innocent, because you're "real alpha men up in alaska, ooooooo." You literally used patriarchal toxic masculinity to mock basic safety procedures lmao, you have no credibility here.

[email protected]

Thanks for that. It really lightens the mood.

[email protected]

Okay, here is your clown nose. You look perfect now.

[email protected]

No u lol.

[email protected]

I am a left winger. I've voted for the greens since I started voting

And sorry, but America is full of crazies who are just calling for violence now.

The right wing is calling for murdering random people like fauci, whereas a lot of people from the left seem to be happy CEO's are getting shot and encouraging it

It's totally fucked. And yes, even Reddit is doing a better job moderating it at the moment.

Nobody should be encouraging murder. Has this actually improved the health care at United? No. They'll just replace the CEO and get more body guards

But, if you encourage the development of laws, that might have an impact. Or it would have, until you guys voted for Trump

[email protected]

The US is over-policed, while simultaneously being under-policed for certain demographics, by a street gang operating under the color of law. We have an overabundance of bad shoots by the cops executing people for nonviolent propert crimes that needs to be dealt with. This is a real issue.

There is also a tendency for some to conflate that with self defense of/in a home under the (generally correct) idea that no property crime deserves the death penalty, like McDonalds managed to conflate the coffee burned old lady with frivolous lawsuits. I am saying that once you break into a home it is no longer "property crime" but something else.

[email protected]

Idk sounds about right to me, 8%-8%. What do you expect, 8% of people carry so 50% of people have a gun on them at any given time? No, more like 8% of people have one at any given time, therefore 8% chance. Your figures seem off to me considering there are none, “nuh uh” isn’t a rebuttal.

I'm saying that if 8% of people carry guns and there are 20 such people at a particular location, then the probability that someone in the group has a gun would be 1-(1-0.08)^20 which is around 80%. For 1 person, it's 8%, for 2 people it's 15%, and so on.

But whatever. I can see you are firmly in the camp of 'we need good people with guns to stop bad people with guns' - a view that basically only exists where gun-violence is endemic.

[email protected]

Well unfortunately, there's already 600,000,000 with no registry to know where, so those are staying. That puts your options at either protect yourself should you ever have to (hopefully, and likely, you never will) or don't and just hope it all works out. Sure, in countries where there already aren't guns I'm not saying they should get more, but they're here to stay.

And I know that if I were in a mass shooting and had to try and stop the shooter, I'd rather have one than not, idk about you.

[email protected]

Being left or right doesn't change what a false equivalency is neither does describing each side in more detail.

This is

"I'm a left winger, the smooth mostly round seeded fruit that shares a name with the color orange is in fact the same as the road vehicle with four wheels, commonly used for transportation of goods that we normally call a car or 'automobile' in the old days"