Guns

[email protected]

It's been a pleasure. My hope is that in future arguments, you will remember your own agency and empowerment.

[email protected]

Actually Sudden Impact same actor tho https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xy-eMIXT4LM

[email protected]

*When anyone does it.

The solution to there being too many guns is to remove the guns. Not add more.

[email protected]

The working class must remain armed.

[email protected]

Aren't shooting clubs and the licensing prohibitively expensive? This is just to disarm the working class. If the poor can't afford equal protection they are slaves.

[email protected]

I wouldn't look at it from that perspective. Similar situation with driving licenses, which require first aid training, 20+ hours of driving lessons with an instructor, theory lessons, testing, and costly things of that nature. If you want a gun and are fit to own one, you will not have a problem doing so, no matter your class.

Gil Wanderley

Thanks for reminding me of Cyanide and Happiness' Guns short.

[email protected]

Not now, unfortunately while they can produce light so you don't shoot your wife six times, they sadly lack the ability to alter the space time continuum and change the past, sorry to disappoint. You have to use the flashlight before you shoot the wrong person, the flashlight can't unshoot someone.

Btw you do know that just because some people kill their wives that doesn't mean everyone will, right? You worried your wife is the next Jody Arias? No? See it works much the same way here, not every man is going to be Chris Benoit. That's like that racist "13% of the population 50% of the crime," it doesn't mean all black people are criminals, nor does your stat mean "all men" or even "all gunowners" are wifemurderers.

[email protected]

'Omosexuals, and 'eterosexuals? Yeah I think that place is England and they just talk like that. Its their language they're allowed to speak it horribly

[email protected]

Some people think that situations where they can rely on others' strength are normal.

Thus they may agree with need for weapons and self-defense, because "it's a dangerous time", but not when everything is in order again. Not even thinking that said "dangerous time" somehow happened and will happen again.

Guns are similar to fire extinguishers and defibrillators in that most of time they are not needed.

[email protected]

I don't even know where to start.

There will be fewer acid attacks with guns because everyone will have access to a way more convenient and easy way of harming each other, yes.

So....problem solved?

Which side of the argument are you actually on?

[email protected]

You are correct, I misspoke there. I was intending to say that I wasn’t saying the burglars were worse than the murderer—it just came out wrong.

[email protected]

Perhaps you will learn to remove your head from your ass and not use AI to make yourself look even more stupid than you are. Who are we kidding though.

[email protected]

The BLM protestors who marched with guns in Georgia didn't get fucked with by the cops at all, because the cops were scared. Look it up.

Other BLM protestors got beat down by cops in riot gear, in countless examples across the country (when the protestors were unarmed).

[email protected]

Just because every abuser with a gun abuses their wife doesn't mean that everyone is an abuser? Well no shit Sherlock.

Now are you going to tell that to the million women who get raped at gun point? Or the four million every year that are threatened by guns!?

No, you are going to make tone deaf jokes about getting a flashlight for your gun so you can see the look on your wife's face before you pull the trigger.

[email protected]

Real obvious answer, you shoot them.

Pavel Chichikov

There are plenty of convenient and easy ways or harming each other outside of guns (France circa 2016). The same goes for suicide.
Gun control doesn't work anyways (Winnenden School Shooting, Jokela School Shooting Finland, 2007, Alphen aan den Rijn Shopping Mall Shooting in Netherlands, 2011, etc. etc.).
Guns save more lives than they take, and people like you purposefully ignore this fact. In trying to save a few hundred lives, you people are willing to deprive millions of the ability to defend themselves to get rid of something you don't understand.
Even if all of this was false, the ability to resist tyranny is more valuable than the lives lost to gun-crime.

[email protected]

I can’t fathom how people saw police beating protesters to death in 2020, are decrying the new Trump presidency as the rise of fascism in America, and still believe that the government should be the only ones with firepower in their hands.

Now is exactly the time when the left should be rallying behind the second amendment.

[email protected]

Well if they've been convicted of DV they're federally barred from firearms ownership, so they shouldn't have guns. I also doubt your assertion that everyone who abuses their wives and has guns shoots their wives, or there'd be like 40% more dead cop-wives, for instance.

Tell them what? That not every rapist has a gun, not every man is a rapist, and not every gun owner is necessarily a rapist or even a man (did you know they let women buy guns these dsys? Wild I know.) Sure, put em on the phone I'll tell them (oh and btw I'm also a rape victim, twice!)

More like "you were spouting silly bullshit so I sardonically replied, as one does." Something is wrong with your thought process that you think "make sure to positively identify your target" means "look your wife in the eyes as you purposefully kill her," I don't think you should have guns, you seem disturbed.

Flying Squid

Every time I see someone say that even the most lenient of gun regulations shouldn't be passed in the U.S., all I can do is picture them at home calling their guns "precious" like Gollum.