Pragearnant
-
lurch (he/him)replied to [email protected] last edited by
This is how the remains of an abortion look like:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-11331955/Pictured-fetus-cell-tissue-nine-weeks-point-abortion-banned-14-states.htmlI don't think seeing this changes anything.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Thank you.
-
i prefer the jt sexkik version, this seems too high effort.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Look what they took from us. We could've been swimming in primordial soup but NOO
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Nope this image is older than llms and modern gen AI. Source, I saw it years ago
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Thank you! I was starting to wonder if I was the one who missed a memo...
-
You mean you didn't notice the penis and testicles in the image?
-
C section all the time!
-
ancient lovecraftian gods
Rule34 still got you covered.
-
Well it's a cross section, so there's only one that we can be sure of.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Why is nobody talking about the fucking double spine?
Or am I somehow stupid and interpreted that fucked up graphic wrong - if that even is possibly, because so much is wrong with that?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Ok look I will fully admit that I didn’t notice that, nor did I notice the fetus wired up to drop out of the anus, but I think you’re making some assumptions here about intelligence/horniness. I was distracted by the myriad questions that arose when considering the prospect of a glass belly to monitor pregnancy. What would it be shaped like? Would it just be a little TV screen like a Tellytubby? A porthole like the windows on SpongeBob’s house? Would it just be a big old solid Buddha belly but made of glass? Or maybe some space age tech that lets it flex like a foldable phone. Also, would people be born like that or would the glass belly form upon becoming pregnant? There’s just so many logistics to consider here..
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
That's anatomically correct. These are the spinous processes cut in half.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I don't know if that makes it better or worse actually
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
It's weird that the baby isn't cut in half too.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
For $50 we can cut the baby up into as many halves as you like.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Must be twins.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Also source: tineye First found on Jun 22, 2016 https://tineye.com/search/803c6ca6ee7b06b185334b6e38cc73963782dfb5?sort=crawl_date&order=asc&page=1
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I'm actually not sure if I'm falling for a joke here, but that's how I remember that a spine looks like
Even if it's a section view, there shouldn't be 2 of them... Or maybe I just don't see it correctly...
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Your marrow needs to go somewhere, also the spinal cord. Your pic has it simply from the side, not a cutaway