Pragearnant

[shadywack@lemmy.today]

If I'm seeing this right, dude's got a cloaca? A cloaca doesn't have to be for eggs?

[cheesyfox@lemmy.sdf.org]

oh you, silly, my horny was leading me to places, i wouldn't have dared to visit with a shotgun. I won't stop asking questions, untill ancient loxecraftian gods themself will drive me crazy

[cheesyfox@lemmy.sdf.org]

missed out on the early era english internet, since, well... Despite how shocking it may sound, english is not the only language around.

[werefreeatlast@lemmy.world]

Okay but why can't they make our cock and balls bigger and functional? I just need a couple more inches and a little girth. Why cant they do that?

[bizarrocullen@lemmy.world]

Isn't this the plot of one of Arnold's movies.

[rooty@lemmy.world]

The Omegaverse and its consequences.

[lurch@sh.itjust.works]

it probably wouldn't as you can't even recognize any form during the period of time abortion is usually allowed. it's basically just flakes of tissue. you'd have to take a sample and check the chromosomes to detect the sex, but I don't think that's easy. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-11331955/Pictured-fetus-cell-tissue-nine-weeks-point-abortion-banned-14-states.html

[lurch@sh.itjust.works]

This is how the remains of an abortion look like:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-11331955/Pictured-fetus-cell-tissue-nine-weeks-point-abortion-banned-14-states.html

I don't think seeing this changes anything.

[p4ulin_kbana@lemmy.eco.br]

Thank you.

[lime@feddit.nu]

i prefer the jt sexkik version, this seems too high effort.

[7toed@midwest.social]

Look what they took from us. We could've been swimming in primordial soup but NOO

[edinbruh@feddit.it]

Nope this image is older than llms and modern gen AI. Source, I saw it years ago

[phorq@lemmy.ml]

Thank you! I was starting to wonder if I was the one who missed a memo...

[madjo@feddit.nl]

You mean you didn't notice the penis and testicles in the image?

[madjo@feddit.nl]

C section all the time!

[sabata11792@ani.social]

ancient lovecraftian gods

Rule34 still got you covered.

[walk_blessed@lemmy.blahaj.zone]

Well it's a cross section, so there's only one that we can be sure of.

[naeap@sopuli.xyz]

Why is nobody talking about the fucking double spine?

Or am I somehow stupid and interpreted that fucked up graphic wrong - if that even is possibly, because so much is wrong with that?

[elliot_crane@lemmy.world]

Ok look I will fully admit that I didn’t notice that, nor did I notice the fetus wired up to drop out of the anus, but I think you’re making some assumptions here about intelligence/horniness. I was distracted by the myriad questions that arose when considering the prospect of a glass belly to monitor pregnancy. What would it be shaped like? Would it just be a little TV screen like a Tellytubby? A porthole like the windows on SpongeBob’s house? Would it just be a big old solid Buddha belly but made of glass? Or maybe some space age tech that lets it flex like a foldable phone. Also, would people be born like that or would the glass belly form upon becoming pregnant? There’s just so many logistics to consider here..

[drt@lemmy.world]

That's anatomically correct. These are the spinous processes cut in half.